Följ oss

Nyheter

Gold and silver: similar, but different

Publicerad

den

Gold and silver: similar, but different Silver is often looked at in gold’s shadow. The price performance of two metals is 80% correlated. We find that the best way to model silver prices is by looking at gold prices.

Commodity Research – Gold and silver: similar, but different

Highlights

  • Silver is often looked at in gold’s shadow. The price performance of two metals is 80% correlated. We find that the best way to model silver prices is by looking at gold prices.
  • However, we identify key differences between the two metals. Whereas gold operates like a currency or monetary asset, silver behaves more like a ‘normal’ commodity, responding to changes in supply and demand.
  • Silver is likely to trade around US$23/oz next year, up from just below US$20/oz currently.

Silver in gold’s shadow

Silver’s price performance is 80% correlated with gold’s price performance. When investor sentiment toward gold turns more positive, optimism toward silver usually follows. For example, as gold prices rose in January 2016 and inflows into gold ETPs surged, silver prices and ETP inflows substantially rose in February 2016.

We find that the best way to model silver prices is to look at gold prices and a number of silver supply and demand indicators. Modelling silver prices on gold alone can give a R-squaredi of 55%. We can enhance the model by looking adding specific silver supply and demand indicators. That raises the R-squared to close to 70%.

When modelling gold prices, we found that physical supply and demand did not help explain prices. In contrast, for silver indicators of supply and demand matters.

More than 50% of silver’s demand comes from industrial fabrication, whereas less than 10% of gold demand comes from that sector. We found global manufacturing PMIs to be a good proxy for industrial demand.

Changes in futures exchange silver inventory and lagged changes in global mining capital expenditure (capex) provide a good proxy for supply of silver. Increases in exchange inventory indicate that more of the metal is readily available. As 75% of silver comes as a by-product of mining for other metals we look at aggregate mining capex across the top 100 metal miners. We lag that change in capex by 18 months as its takes time for changes in investment to translate into changes in supply.

etfs1

(Click to enlarge)

Out of sample testing from 2014 shows that the model performs well and captures key turning points in silver’s performance.

etfs2

(Click to enlarge)

The big spike in silver’s price in 2010-2011 is very difficult to explain. Anecdotally it was accounted for by the market’s reaction to central bank expansion of their balance sheets in the aftermath of the financial crisis.

However, the fact that central bank balance sheets remained bloated for some time afterwards and that silver prices deflated indicates that the price gains were overdone and we believe that period was effectively a price bubble.

Silver to US$23/oz

We expect gold to rise to US$1440/oz in 2017. We assume that global manufacturing PMIs will still be weighed-down by poor performance in large developed economies (outside of US) but get some uplift from the US and emerging markets and therefore rise by a modest 1%. To be conservative, we also assume that exchange inventory, which has been elevated recently, does not decline. Lastly following the 20% y-o-y decline in miner capex 6 months ago, we have an input for the 18-month lagged capex factor in the model. Based on these inputs, silver is likely to rise by just under 20%, to just over US$23/oz.

Exploring silver fundamentals

While the model presented above displays a high R-square, it ties the price of one commodity to another without exploring all of the metal’s own fundamentals.

For illustrative purposes we remove gold prices from the model and introduce some of the explanitory variables from our gold model into the silver model. This second model has a lower R-square and the forecasting power of the model is more comprimised by the 20110-2011 bubble than the simple model.

We find a number of interesting observations from this excerise:
• Unlike for gold, nominal treasury yields are not a significant explanitory variable for silver. This accords with the fact that gold behaves more like a currency/fiancial asset than silver.
• While consumer price inflation (CPI) is a statisticaly significant driver for silver, producer price inflation (PPI) is statistically stronger. This reflects silver’s industrial qualities.
• In contrast to gold, supply of the silver tends to influence its price. Because mine supply of gold represents only a tiny fraction of the above ground stock of gold, and a large amount of gold is held in bullion and jewellery form, changes in mine supply account for very little of the gold that changes hands each year. In contrast a large amount of silver mined goes into industrial applications and thefore is ‘consumed’ until the goods using silver, such as electrical products or photovoltaic panels, is recycled. We measure silver supply in three different ways: silver ore production, change in exchange inventory and an 18-month lag to miner capex.

• Like gold, silver priced in US Dollars is driven by the trade-weighted US Dollar exchange rate.
• Like gold, sentiment towards the metal measured by futures market specualtive positioing is a significant explanitory variable.

Summary of expansive silver model:

etfs3

(Click to enlarge)

Application of this second model is more difficult, because it does not deal with the 2010-2011 bubble so well. Also current current specualtive positioning in silver futures looks very streteched. Futures market optimism was no-where near this high, even in the 2010-2011 bubble and so a model calibrated on historic data, would look to forecast silver prices substantially higher than where they are today.

etfs4

(Click to enlarge)

Using the same assumption for currency movement we had in our gold model and consistent movements in PPI inflation as we had for CPIii, we look at what price the model would give us. We also assume that speculative positioning in silver remains elevated, but not as overstretched as they are right nowiii. We assume that ore production supply or exchange inventory don’t increase and that lagged capex in mining declines 20% (as in the simple model). This model gives us a price close to US$25/oz (25% increase) in 2017. However, we believe the first simple model is likely to give more reliable results. The second model simply helps us the understand some of the fundamental drivers of silver better.

i A measure of how close the fitted data and actual data are. 0% means that the model explains none of the variability and 100% means the model explains all the variability.
ii We assumed CPI inflation will rise from 0.8% to 1.1% in the gold model and PPI inflation rise from 0% to 0.5% in the silver model.
iii Speculative positioning is currently above 87,000 contracts. We assume positioning trims to 40,000 contracts, which is elevated compared to the 27,000 series average.

For more information contact:

ETF Securities Research team
ETF Securities (UK) Limited
T +44 (0) 207 448 4336
E info@etfsecurities.com

Important Information

The analyses in the above tables are purely for information purposes. They do not reflect the performance of any ETF Securities’ products . The futures and roll returns are not necessarily investable.

General

This communication has been provided by ETF Securities (UK) Limited (“ETFS UK”) which is authorised and regulated by the United Kingdom Financial Conduct Authority (the “FCA”).

This communication is only targeted at qualified or professional investors.

Fortsätt läsa
Annons
Klicka för att kommentera

Skriv en kommentar

Din e-postadress kommer inte publiceras. Obligatoriska fält är märkta *

Nyheter

Schroders noterar aktiv USA-ETF på Xetra

Publicerad

den

iShares Europe Focus UCITS ETFer investerar i europeiska företag och möjliggör anpassning efter geografisk intäktskälla. Investeringsstrategin skiljer mellan företag som genererar minst 50 procent av sina intäkter i Europa och de som huvudsakligen fokuserar på icke-europeiska marknader.

iShares Europe Focus UCITS ETFer investerar i europeiska företag och möjliggör anpassning efter geografisk intäktskälla. Investeringsstrategin skiljer mellan företag som genererar minst 50 procent av sina intäkter i Europa och de som huvudsakligen fokuserar på icke-europeiska marknader.

Schroder US Equity Active UCITS ETF förvaltas aktivt och investerar i nordamerikanska aktier. Investeringsstrategin fokuserar på företag med tydliga värde- och/eller kvalitetsegenskaper och riktar sig till undervärderade företag med starka marknadspositioner samt företag som uppvisar stabila intäkter och robusta balansräkningar.

Xtrackers II Global Government Bond UCITS ETF ger exponering mot investment grade-statsobligationer från utvecklade länder, där USA, Japan, Frankrike och Tyskland representerar de största landsviktningarna.

NamnISIN
Kortnamn
Utdelningspolicy
Avgift
iShares Europe Domestic Focus UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)IE000P2CI9P3
DOME (EUR)
Ackumulerande
0,25%
iShares Europe Foreign Focus UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)IE00078SFIQ6
EUFG (EUR)
Ackumulerande
0,25%
Schroder US Equity Active UCITS ETF ACC USDIE0003OZJ573
SEIU (EUR)
Ackumulerande
0,20%
Xtrackers II Global Government Bond UCITS ETF 4DLU3284391318
XGB4 (EUR)
Utdelande
0,20%

Produktutbudet inom Deutsche Börses ETF- och ETP-segment omfattar för närvarande totalt 2 808 ETFer, 204 ETCer och 329 ETNer. Med detta urval och en genomsnittlig månatlig handelsvolym på cirka 28,6 miljarder euro är Deutsche Börse Xetra den ledande handelsplatsen för ETFer och ETPer i Europa.

Fortsätt läsa

Nyheter

Virtune noterar Virtune Sui ETP på Nasdaq Stockholm

Publicerad

den

Virtune, en svensk reglerad kapitalförvaltare av kryptotillgångar, meddelar noteringen av Virtune Sui ETP på Nasdaq Stockholm, den största börsen i Norden.

Virtune, en svensk reglerad kapitalförvaltare av kryptotillgångar, meddelar noteringen av Virtune Sui ETP på Nasdaq Stockholm, den största börsen i Norden.

Virtune är en svensk kapitalförvaltare och emittent av fysiskt backade börshandlade produkter (ETPer) inom krypto. Sedan lanseringen 2023 har Virtune fått förtroende av mer än 160 000 investerare och har idag cirka 300 miljoner USD i förvaltat kapital (AUM), vilket stärker bolagets position som en av Europas ledande emittenter av reglerade krypto-ETPer. Bolaget har över 90% marknadsandel för krypto-ETNer på Nasdaq Nordics.

Om Virtune Sui ETP

Virtune Sui ETP är en fysiskt backad börshandlad produkt som är utformad för att erbjuda investerare ett säkert och kostnadseffektivt sätt att få exponering mot Sui. Detta möjliggörs genom en transparent och fysiskt backad struktur med institutionell säkerhetsnivå.

Viktig information om Virtune Sui ETP

• 1:1 exponering mot SUI

• 100% fysiskt uppbackad av SUI

• 0,95% årlig förvaltningsavgift

Virtune Sui ETP

• Fullständigt namn: Virtune Sui ETP

• Kortnamn: Virtune Sui

• Ticker: VIRSUI

• Handelsvaluta: SEK

Första handelsdag: Tisdagen den 28 april 2026

ISIN: SE0025159833

Om Sui

Sui (SUI) är en blockkedja av nästa generation som är utformad för att hantera höga transaktionsvolymer med nästan omedelbar slutgiltighet och låga avgifter. Drivs av programmeringsspråket Move och en innovativ objektcentrerad datamodell, vilket gör det möjligt för utvecklare att skapa skalbara applikationer såsom spel, DeFi och NFT:er samtidigt som en sömlös användarupplevelse levereras.

Christopher Kock, VD för Virtune:
“Vi är mycket glada över att fortsätta expandera vårt produkterbjudande på vår hemmamarknad, Nasdaq Stockholm. Idag noterar vi Virtune Sui ETP, en produkt som har varit efterlängtad av investerare runt om i Norden. ETP:n är nu tillgänglig via banker och nätmäklare i Norden, handlas i SEK och är 100% fysiskt backad av SUI.”

Kryptoinvesteringar är förknippat med hög risk. Virtune ger inte investeringsråd. Investeringar görs på egen risk. Värdepapper kan öka eller minska i värde, det finns ingen garanti att man får tillbaka investerat kapital. Läs prospekt, KID, villkor på www.virtune.com.

Fortsätt läsa

Nyheter

Invesco: Gold signals a shifting world order without a new leader

Publicerad

den

The United States remains economically and financially dominant, but beneath the surface doubts are growing about how sustainable that position really is. According to Benjamin Jones, head of research at Invesco, the continued rise in gold suggests that investors are preparing for a world in which the balance of power is shifting, without any clear alternative leader emerging.

The United States remains economically and financially dominant, but beneath the surface doubts are growing about how sustainable that position really is. According to Benjamin Jones, head of research at Invesco, the continued rise in gold suggests that investors are preparing for a world in which the balance of power is shifting, without any clear alternative leader emerging.

The US twin deficits

The joint, pre-2025 rally in US risk assets and the dollar sits uneasily with concerns over US fiscal and current-account deficits, a deteriorating Net International Investment Position (NIIP), reindustrialisation goals, and the secular rise in gold, explains Jones.

“In our view, the long-running rally in gold alongside high returns and rising concentration in dollar assets reflects two forces: a faltering world order and the economics of heavy US fiscal imbalances, rising external obligations, and persistent deficits; but also, the unique success of US firms in driving GDP growth, earnings and innovation. Ironically, that strength may itself increase the risk of a financial, currency or balance-of-payments shock in a geopolitical crisis.”

According to Jones, the sharp drop in the US NIIP has come as foreign claims outstrip US claims abroad. “This was driven less by foreign Treasury holdings, which have stabilised, and more by inflows into private-sector assets, especially equities, as investors embraced “US Exceptionalism” as shorthand for superior growth and financial performance relative to peers such as Western Europe and Japan. The result has been major inflows into US equities, corporate debt and private markets.”

Even though much of the increase in exposure has been to risk assets rather than bonds, large outflows could still threaten fiscal and financial stability, says Jones. “For now, trade barriers and efforts to weaken the dollar to promote reindustrialisation have prompted rebalancing away from US stocks, bonds and the dollar. Amid geopolitical tensions, weaker fiscal and external positions, and renewed protectionism and unpredictability, official investors and private investors have sharply increased gold purchases as a store of value.”

Heavy gold flow in financial markets

US financial leadership persists despite geoeconomic rebalancing toward rivals, Jones continues. “The US still leads in market capitalisation, turnover and liquidity, while the Treasury market remains the largest and deepest pool of debt issuance. Dollar liquidity is so high that trades <<between other currencies are often executed through the dollar. Global portfolio concentration in the US has also been reinforced by inflows into benchmarked funds and passive trackers. The core driver remains US exceptionalism. Rich valuations and concentration in US tech may suggest a bubble, yet US firms have continued to deliver innovation, market share, revenue and earnings growth.”

According to Jones, rivals remain less compelling from a market perspective. “Europe has lagged the US since the financial crisis, while China has matched or surpassed US innovation but, until recently, delivered weaker market returns due to domestic de-risking policies.”

The US share of official reserves has declined somewhat, while the euro and most other currencies have levelled off, Jones continues. “Gold’s share has risen sharply since the start of the war in Ukraine in 2022, suggesting the TINA problem persists: there is no real alternative to the dollar other than gold itself. Central banks increasingly prefer the safety of gold, the liability of no government.”

Future: Geopolitical, economic, technological and military competition
An open world economy helped many countries narrow productivity gaps with the US, but leadership is no longer aligned across power domains. “Economically, the world is increasingly tripolar, centred on the US, China and the eurozone. Militarily, power is concentrated in the US, China and Russia. Technologically, the US and China are at or near parity, while others lag. Financially, however, the US still has no peer,” notes Jones.

He continues: “Conventional economic, military and technological competition therefore still matters, even in a nuclear world. US concerns about overextension are sharpened by China’s vast industrial capacity, with output and shipbuilding far exceeding that of the US. Recent wars have shown that modern conflict still depends on industrial mobilisation for technology, drones and ammunition. This helps explain the US push for reindustrialisation.”

At the same time, US fiscal and external obligations create vulnerabilities if confidence were shaken by a future crisis, conflict or major shock. Jones concludes: “Washington is also retreating from parts of the multilateral order while seeking to reshape global trade more in its favour, reinforcing perceptions of unilateralism. Gold may be signaling an incomplete global reordering: not a clear new polarity, but an “unipolar” world in which leadership shifts by issue, region and moment. The US and the dollar would still likely remain first among equals, supported by deep financial markets, technological dynamism and strategic advantages, even as rival powers continue to rise.”

Fortsätt läsa

Prenumerera på nyheter om ETFer

* indicates required

Populära