Följ oss

Nyheter

”Is Wall Street warming up to Crypto?”

Publicerad

den

"Is Wall Street warming up to Crypto?" Markets continued to suffer on the back of the latest SEC complaints, with a new lawsuit launched against Coinbase and an unprecedented motion to freeze the assets of Binance’s US entity. Between June 5 and June 10, we saw more than $1 billion of mainly long liquidations. Long tail assets outside Bitcoin and Ethereum dropped by more than 20% week over week, especially alleged securities by the SEC. Spreads on Binance US became about 20 times wider than those on Coinbase and Kraken — and market depth dropped by 78% since the SEC crackdown. There is a flight to quality and safety with a rising Bitcoin dominance approaching the 50% mark, an all-time high in months while Tether’s market value broke a record of $83.3 billion.

Markets continued to suffer on the back of the latest SEC complaints, with a new lawsuit launched against Coinbase and an unprecedented motion to freeze the assets of Binance’s US entity. Between June 5 and June 10, we saw more than $1 billion of mainly long liquidations. Long tail assets outside Bitcoin and Ethereum dropped by more than 20% week over week, especially alleged securities by the SEC. Spreads on Binance US became about 20 times wider than those on Coinbase and Kraken — and market depth dropped by 78% since the SEC crackdown. There is a flight to quality and safety with a rising Bitcoin dominance approaching the 50% mark, an all-time high in months while Tether’s market value broke a record of $83.3 billion.

Figure 1: Weekly TVL and Price Performance of Major Crypto Categories

Source: Coingecko and DeFi Llama. Close data as of June 12.

5 Things to Remember in Markets this Week

• Regulatory headwinds in the U.S. continue to pressure Coinbase and Binance: The Securities and Exchanges Commission (SEC) sued Coinbase over operating an unregistered exchange. The SEC also filed a temporary restraining order and motion to freeze assets held by Binance and its founder, Champeng Zhao, which is an unprecedented move against the world’s largest exchange, foreshadowing a prolonged regulatory crackdown on centralized exchanges. The recent complaints alongside the fall of FTX created a paradigm shift in investor behaviors with decentralized exchanges like Uniswap gathering more traction due to outflows from Binance and Coinbase. However, as discussed in this report, decentralized entities might no longer be immune to regulatory scrutiny.

Figure 2: Net Flow Ethereum Staking

Source: 21shares on Dune Analytics

Ethereum staking experienced two consecutive days of outflows for the first time since April, as shown in Figure 2, most exits in the past week originated from Coinbase.

• Adoption in Hong Kong and Singapore grows: A member of the Legislative Council of Hong Kong extended an open invitation to welcome all global digital asset marketplaces including Coinbase to register in HK. Hong Kong aims to become a global crypto hub by attracting foreign investments, for example, the first Chinese financial institution to issue a tokenized security. In collaboration with UBS, and under both Swiss and English law, Bank of China investment bank issued structured notes worth the equivalent of $28M (200 million of offshore renminbi) on the Ethereum blockchain. Moreover, Circle obtained a license from Singapore to offer digital payment token services and cross-border and domestic money transfer services which outlines the scale of adoption of real-world assets in the city-state.

• Ethereum formalizes the scope of improvements for the next major upgrade: Dubbed Dencun, the next network upgrade will introduce five improvement proposals designed to expand the data storage capacity and reduce transaction costs: EIP-1153, 4788, 5656, and EIP 6780. However, the focus will be on EIP 4844, otherwise named Proto-DankSharding, which will allocate more space for ‘data blobs’. Blobs refer to transactions that are only stored by Ethereum’s consensus layer, which effectively makes the data processing from layer 2 networks to Ethereum much cheaper than historically (). Optimism, a layer 2 network, is anticipated to be among the primary beneficiaries of this upgrade, particularly as the Bedrock upgrade has markedly enhanced the network’s performance by reducing the average transaction fees by more than 50%. The upgrade will facilitate the realization of scaling networks’ full potential by providing a cost-effective solution for conducting financial activities on-chain for tokenization and other use cases.

Figure 3: Comparing L2 Fees

Source: @msilb7 on Dune Analytics

• Polygon: The pioneering scalability solution of Ethereum has unveiled its strategic initiative to transform and enhance the network’s infrastructure. Referred to as Polygon 2.0, this innovative design embraces a network of Layer2 solutions, leveraging Zero Knowledge technology. As a reminder, Zero-knowledge refers to a method that allows verifying information without revealing any underlying data, ensuring privacy and security in transactions. That said, the new architecture aims to consolidate Polygon’s diverse scaling offerings into a unified framework, enabling users to transition between various scaling services effortlessly. Ultimately, the upgraded Polygon network will focus on establishing a seamless and interconnected web of L2 chains, empowered and interconnected through Zero-Knowledge Proofs technology.

• Adoption of NFTs grows within the crypto community, while regulatory headwinds drive Web3 outside of the US: Kraken launched their NFT marketplace on June 8, expanding its offering now to include Polygon NFTs, such as Reddit collectible avatars. Its beta version already supported Ethereum and Solana. Kraken is making an effort to make NFTs simple and accessible to a broader audience without the need to own self-custody wallets.

What You Should Pay Attention To Assets classified as securities by the SEC are likely to face stricter market conditions

Thus, we could see US-based exchanges exercising caution with respect to these disputed assets until there is further clarity, potentially leading to a wave of delistings. For instance, Robinhood removed SOL, ADA, and MATIC from its platform due to their involvement in the civil lawsuit against Coinbase last week. For context, users have until the 27th to withdraw their assets to external wallets. Otherwise, the platform will automatically sell them and credit the accounts with the corresponding USD value. Etoro took a similar stance as they disabled the purchase of MANA, MATIC, and ALGO. In that view, we anticipate a gradual flight to safety with capital migrating towards Bitcoin and Ethereum, as the ongoing trend of delistings could increase the selling pressure on the disputed assets. The ongoing movement towards high-quality assets is evident as Bitcoin’s dominance broke through its 2.5-year resistance level of 47%, signaling a notable shift in the market dynamic.

Figure 4: Token index composed of assets initially deemed as securities by SEC v. the broader market

Source: CryptoQuant

Binance is lawyering up, while Coinbase will keep fighting for regulatory clarity in court: Coinbase is determined to contest the allegations in court, evident by their CEO, Brian Armstrong, interview with the Wall Street Journal. The outcome of this case is of great significance to the industry, as Coinbase is focused on addressing the absence of clear regulatory recognition for assets that initially represent security traits during capital raising but later transition into utility tokens as the ecosystem grows and more sophisticated use cases emerge. At the same time, the network continues to decentralize over time. Monitoring this case as a precedent is vital, as it will shed light on a crucial aspect of the structure and utility of tokens, as well as establish their legal status in the United States. Alternatively, it is possible that the Department of Justice (DOJ) and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) may take further regulatory action against Binance. The latter also prepares for this battle by staffing a global sanctions and CTF Investigations team. So far, Binance has endured almost $300M in net flows in the past 24 hours, according to our dashboard on Dune Analytics.

Polygon is poised to serve as the foundational value layer of the internet. As further information unfolds in the coming weeks regarding the new network, the redesigned structure of the Matic token, and the seamless integration of the comprehensive blockchain framework, Polygon’s forthcoming architecture emerges as a captivating development. By harnessing zero-knowledge proof technology to enable intercommunication between sovereign networks, Polygon is well-positioned to address critical barriers to entry in the realm of cross-chain communication, especially as it pertains to unified liquidity. This strategic direction positions Polygon to become a formidable infrastructure leader, consolidating its array of scaling solutions and competing effectively against leading rollup networks such as Optimism and Arbitrum, which are also offering interconnected L3 layers through their Superchain and Orbit initiatives.

Decentralized autonomous organizations (DAOs) and decent*ralized exchanges (DEXs) could be held legally liable for their actions in the U.S. The Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) won its lawsuit against Ooki DAO, a decentralized autonomous organization operating tokenized margin trading and lending protocol for tokenized margin trading and lending. This is the first time a DAO is held liable in the eyes of the law in the U.S., which could set the precedent DAOs of any kind including DEXs in the future. The silver lining here is that bad actors or offshore entities may no longer be able to circumvent the law under the invisibility cloak of decentralization.

Next Week’s Calendar

These are the top 3 events we’re monitoring for next week.

• The Future of Digital Assets: Providing Clarity for the Digital Asset Ecosystem US House Financial Services Committee to hold a session that will be important to monitor as it builds on the newly introduced bill called “Digital Asset Market Structure” proposed by House Financial Services Committee Chair Patrick Mchenry and Agriculture Committee Chair Glenn which should help provide a statutory framework for digital assets, combined with a bipartisan bill draft for stablecoin issuance.

• The unsealing of the Hinman documents in the Ripple v. SEC case should help drive further regulatory clarity around Bitcoin as it pertains to how the agency views statements made about the asset in terms of its designation as a security or a commodity.

• FOMC minutes on Wednesday should paint a more complete picture of where the FED stands regarding rate hikes based on their analysis of the CPI, which rose at a 4% annual rate in May, the lowest in two years, although core inflation was still up 5.3% from a year ago.

Source: Forex Factory, CoinMarketCal

Research Newsletter

Each week the 21Shares Research team will publish our data-driven insights into the crypto asset world through this newsletter. Please direct any comments, questions, and words of feedback to research@21shares.com

Disclaimer

The information provided does not constitute a prospectus or other offering material and does not contain or constitute an offer to sell or a solicitation of any offer to buy securities in any jurisdiction. Some of the information published herein may contain forward-looking statements. Readers are cautioned that any such forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve risks and uncertainties and that actual results may differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements as a result of various factors. The information contained herein may not be considered as economic, legal, tax or other advice and users are cautioned to base investment decisions or other decisions solely on the content hereof.

Fortsätt läsa
Annons
Klicka för att kommentera

Skriv en kommentar

Din e-postadress kommer inte publiceras. Obligatoriska fält är märkta *

Nyheter

Vilken är den bästa fond som följer Nasdaq-100?

Publicerad

den

Nasdaq 100-indexet följer de 100 största aktierna noterade på Nasdaq-börsen. De utvalda företagen kommer huvudsakligen från sektorer som hårdvara och mjukvara, telekommunikation, detaljhandel och bioteknik – inklusive alla stora amerikanska teknikföretag. Däremot ingår inte företag från energi-, finans- och fastighetssektorerna i Nasdaq-100. Vilken är den bästa fond som följer Nasdaq-100?

Nasdaq 100-indexet följer de 100 största aktierna noterade på Nasdaq-börsen. De utvalda företagen kommer huvudsakligen från sektorer som hårdvara och mjukvara, telekommunikation, detaljhandel och bioteknik – inklusive alla stora amerikanska teknikföretag. Däremot ingår inte företag från energi-, finans- och fastighetssektorerna i Nasdaq-100. Vilken är den bästa fond som följer Nasdaq-100?

I USA har den populära QQQ ETF, som spårar Nasdaq 100, varit tillgänglig sedan 1999. Den förvaltas av Invesco. Den europeiska motsvarigheten till denna ETF använder tickersymbolen eQQQ. Till skillnad från den amerikanska marknaden finns det dock flera ETF-leverantörer i Europa som spårar Nasdaq 100 – så det är värt att jämföra.

ETF-investerare kan dra nytta av värdeökningar och utdelningar från Nasdaq 100-beståndsdelarna. För närvarande spåras Nasdaq 100-indexet av tretton ETFer.

Förvaltningsarvode fond som följer Nasdaq-100

Nedan har vi listat förvaltningsarvoden för fond som följer Nasdaq-100. Samtliga dessa ETFer har en konkurrenskraftig prissättning, allt från AXA IM Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF USD Acc, som debiterar sina andelsägare 0,14 procent per år till iShares Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF (Acc) som tar ut 0,33 procent i arvode. I jämförelse kostar de flesta aktivt förvaltade fonder mycket mer avgifter per år.

NamnValutaISINKortnamnFörvaltningsavgift
AXA IM Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF USD AccUSDIE000QDFFK00ANAU0.14%
Invesco Nasdaq-100 Swap UCITS ETF AccUSDIE00BNRQM384EQQX0.20%
Invesco Nasdaq-100 Swap UCITS ETF DistUSDIE000RUF4QN8EQQD0.20% p.a.
Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF 1CUSDIE00BMFKG444XNAS0.20%
Amundi Nasdaq-100 II UCITS ETF AccEURLU1829221024LYMS0.22%
Amundi Nasdaq-100 II UCITS ETF DistUSDLU2197908721NADQ0.22%
Amundi Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF EUR (C)EURLU16810382436AQQ0.23%
Amundi Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF USDUSDLU168103832610A40.23%
Deka Nasdaq-100® UCITS ETFEURDE000ETFL623D6RH0.25%
Invesco EQQQ Nasdaq-100 UCITS ETFUSDIE0032077012EQQQ0.30%
Invesco EQQQ Nasdaq-100 UCITS ETF AccUSDIE00BFZXGZ54EQQB0.30%
iShares Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF (DE)USDDE000A0F5UF5EXXT0.31%
iShares Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF (Acc)USDIE00B53SZB19SXRV0.33%

Som alltid vill vi påminna att om det finns flera olika börshandlade fonder som täcker samma index eller segment är det förvaltningskostnaden som avgör. Antar vi att dessa Nasdaqfonder ger samma avkastning kommer den som har lägst avgift att utvecklas bäst, allt annat lika. Grundregeln är alltså, betala aldrig för mycket då detta kommer att äta upp din avkastning.

Nasdaq 100 ETFer i jämförelse

Förutom avkastning finns det ytterligare viktiga faktorer att tänka på när du väljer en Nasdaq 100 ETF. För att ge ett bra beslutsunderlag hittar du en lista över alla Nasdaq 100 ETFer med detaljer om vinstanvändning, fondens hemvist och replikeringsmetod.

NamnUtdelningspolicyHemvistReplikeringsmetod
iShares Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF (Acc)AckumulerandeIrlandFysisk replikering
Invesco EQQQ Nasdaq-100 UCITS ETFUtdelandeIrlandFysisk replikering
iShares Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF (DE)UtdelandeTysklandFysisk replikering
Amundi Nasdaq-100 II UCITS ETF AccAckumulerandeLuxemburgOfinansierad swap
Invesco EQQQ Nasdaq-100 UCITS ETF AccAckumulerandeIrlandFysisk replikering
Amundi Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF EUR (C)AckumulerandeLuxemburgOfinansierad swap
Amundi Nasdaq-100 II UCITS ETF DistUtdelandeLuxemburgOfinansierad swap
AXA IM Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF USD AccAckumulerandeIrlandFysisk replikering
Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF 1CAckumulerandeIrlandFysisk replikering
Invesco Nasdaq-100 Swap UCITS ETF AccAckumulerandeIrlandOfinansierad swap
Amundi Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF USDAckumulerandeLuxemburgOfinansierad swap
Invesco Nasdaq-100 Swap UCITS ETF DistUtdelandeIrlandOfinansierad swap
Deka Nasdaq-100® UCITS ETFUtdelandeTysklandFysisk replikering

Handla fond som följer Nasdaq-100

Samtliga dessa ETFer är europeiska börshandlade fonder. Dessa fond handlas på flera olika börser, till exempel Deutsche Boerse Xetra och London Stock Exchange.

Det betyder att det går att handla andelar i denna ETF genom de flesta svenska banker och Internetmäklare, till exempel DEGIRONordnet, Aktieinvest och Avanza.

Fortsätt läsa

Nyheter

Inevitable in India: Crowds, cricket and capital gains tax

Publicerad

den

capital gains tax India’s vibrant economy and structural growth opportunities continue to be the envy of many emerging markets. But somewhat unique to this market are tax implications that investors should be aware of. Our Franklin Templeton Global ETF team examines these structural issues in Asia’s third-largest economy.

India’s vibrant economy and structural growth opportunities continue to be the envy of many emerging markets. But somewhat unique to this market are tax implications that investors should be aware of. Our Franklin Templeton Global ETF team examines these structural issues in Asia’s third-largest economy.

In merely a decade, India has taken a quantum leap from the world’s 11th largest economy to become its fifth largest. By many accounts, it is expected to remain one of the world’s fastest-growing major economies over the coming years. And even after a banner 2023 during which the country’s benchmark indexes surged and Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi celebrated high-profile successes—from historic technological and space exploration achievements to rising global diplomatic clout—this election year has already marked more progress in supporting Modi’s pro-growth, pro-jobs efforts.

The world’s most populous nation has advanced ties with Western countries over free trade. In addition to agreements with Australia and the United Arab Emirates, it has worked to better integrate the “Global South’s” development needs and ambitions with that of the G20. Modi has touted innovative partnerships for a new multilateral rail and sea corridor to connect India with the Middle East and the European Union (EU)—seen as a counterweight to China’s vast Belt-and-Road infrastructure corridor.

India reached its latest notable trade pact, nearly 16 years in the making, in March with the European Free Trade Association—Iceland, Liechtenstein, Norway and Switzerland. The agreement lifts Indian tariffs to secure US$100 billion in foreign direct investment commitments from the non-EU markets to India across multiple sectors.

With India still an enviable investment powerhouse, it seems important to clarify a few aspects of this dynamic equity market.

How exchange-traded funds (ETFs) treat India capital gains tax (CGT)

Foreign investors should be aware that CGT is an integral part of investing in Indian equities that cannot be circumvented. Investors in India funds are subject to CGT implications regardless of fund provider, and CGT is based and calculated on a fund as a whole, not an individual investor’s position.

The details: Foreign investors owning local Indian stocks are subject to taxation on capital gains at a short-term rate of 15% for positions held for less than one year and at a long-term rate of 10% for positions held over one year.

To accrue or not to accrue: Consistent with market practice for US-listed India ETF providers, Franklin Templeton accrues unrealized CGT in its daily net asset value (NAV). This can lead to differences in performance relative to the benchmark, which does not include CGT. As a result, rising markets will typically lead to fund underperformance against a benchmark, while weaker market environments will typically generate outperformance (provided the fund is in an unrealized capital gain position where the current market value of fund holdings is above their historical book cost). See chart below.

For UCITS-listed India funds, there is a divergence in methods utilized by fund providers in accruing and reporting CGT. Some do not accrue unrealized CGT in the NAV, but will charge CGT to investors directly at redemption, which we believe leaves investors with a level of opaqueness and uncertainty over their ultimate proceeds. This method also creates an elevated NAV compared to what investors will actually experience. While Franklin Templeton’s approach to CGT may at times lead to a higher tracking difference,1 we believe investors benefit from increased transparency and a more reflective experience.

The magnitude and impact of CGT for a specific fund is heavily dependent on several variables, such as the timing of purchases and sales, performance of the holdings and their volatility, and the size of flows in and out of the fund relative to its assets under management (AUM).

Understanding the impact: The CGT impact to fund performance is driven by the path of returns, timing of individual lots and price points. Very broadly speaking, in rising markets, an NAV-accruing fund will likely underperform its benchmark and vice versa.

Consideration of comparability: Because different providers handle CGT differently, the comparability of fund performance metrics may be affected. As investors, it’s prudent to consider how these nuances may influence investment decisions within the broader context of your financial strategy.

The bigger picture: While CGT considerations are important, they should be viewed within the broader spectrum of investment objectives and risk tolerance. Taking a long-term perspective and being mindful of other important characteristics of the investment vehicle of choice may aid in the decision-making process.

In summary, India remains an attractive investment destination with compelling growth prospects for its equity markets. Investors seeking India allocation through an ETF should be aware of the current tax regime and what varying methods of accounting methodologies really mean for fund valuation.

Fortsätt läsa

Nyheter

XB33 ETF köper företagsobligationer i euro som förfaller 2033

Publicerad

den

Xtrackers II Target Maturity Sept 2033 EUR Corporate Bond UCITS ETF 1D (XB33 ETF) med ISIN LU2673523564, försöker följa Bloomberg MSCI Euro Corporate September 2033 SRI-index. Bloomberg MSCI Euro Corporate September 2033 SRI-index följer företagsobligationer denominerade i EUR. Indexet speglar inte ett konstant löptidsintervall (som är fallet med de flesta andra obligationsindex). Istället ingår endast obligationer som förfaller mellan oktober 2032 och september 2033 i indexet (ETF kommer att stängas i efterhand). Indexet består av ESG (environmental, social and governance) screenade företagsobligationer. Betyg: Investment Grade.

Xtrackers II Target Maturity Sept 2033 EUR Corporate Bond UCITS ETF 1D (XB33 ETF) med ISIN LU2673523564, försöker följa Bloomberg MSCI Euro Corporate September 2033 SRI-index. Bloomberg MSCI Euro Corporate September 2033 SRI-index följer företagsobligationer denominerade i EUR. Indexet speglar inte ett konstant löptidsintervall (som är fallet med de flesta andra obligationsindex). Istället ingår endast obligationer som förfaller mellan oktober 2032 och september 2033 i indexet (ETF kommer att stängas i efterhand). Indexet består av ESG (environmental, social and governance) screenade företagsobligationer. Betyg: Investment Grade.

Den börshandlade fondens TER (total cost ratio) uppgår till 0,12 procent p.a. Xtrackers II Target Maturity Sept 2033 EUR Corporate Bond UCITS ETF 1D är den enda ETF som följer Bloomberg MSCI Euro Corporate September 2033 SRI-index. ETFen replikerar det underliggande indexets prestanda genom samplingsteknik (köper ett urval av de mest relevanta indexbeståndsdelarna). Ränteintäkterna (kupongerna) i ETFen delas ut till investerarna (Minst årligen).

Denna ETF lanserades den 8 november 2023 och har sin hemvist i Luxemburg.

Bloomberg MSCI Euro Corporate SRI PAB Index syftar till att spegla resultatet på följande marknad:

  • EUR-denominerade företagsobligationer
  • Endast obligationer med investeringsklass
  • Obligationer med en löptid på minst 1 år
  • Minsta utestående belopp på 300 miljoner euro per obligation
  • Endast obligationer utgivna av företag med en MSCI ESG-rating på BBB eller högre och en MSCI ESG Impact Monitor över 1 ingår

Indexet övervakar absoluta växthusgasutsläpp (“GHG”) genom att sätta en initial 50 % avkolning av absoluta växthusgasutsläpp i förhållande till moderuniversumet följt av en årlig 7 % avkolningsbana för absoluta växthusgasutsläpp.

Obligationer utgivna av företag som är involverade i alkohol, tobak, hasardspel, vuxenunderhållning, genetiskt modifierade organismer (GMO), kärnkraft, civila skjutvapen, militära vapen (inklusive minor, klusterbomber, kemiska vapen) är undantagna.

Handla XB33 ETF

Xtrackers II Target Maturity Sept 2033 EUR Corporate Bond UCITS ETF 1D (XB33 ETF) är en europeisk börshandlad fond. Denna fond handlas på Deutsche Boerse Xetra.

Det betyder att det går att handla andelar i denna ETF genom de flesta svenska banker och Internetmäklare, till exempel DEGIRONordnet, Aktieinvest och Avanza.

Börsnoteringar

BörsValutaKortnamn
XETRAEURXB33

Största innehav

ISINNamnVikt %Land
IE00BZ3FDF20DEUTSCHE GLOBAL LIQUIDITY SERI0.54%Irland
CH1214797172BBG01BFYVYX8 CREDIT SUISSE GROUP AG 3/290.18%Schweiz
XS0525602339RABOBANK 07/250.14%Holland
FR0000471930FRANCE TELECOM 01/330.13%Frankrike
FR0013324357SANOFI SA 1.375% 2030-03-210.12%Frankrike
XS1001749289MICROSOFT CORP 12/280.12%USA
XS1372839214VODAFONE GROUP PLC 08/26 EUR515200.12%Storbritannien
XS2461234622BBG0162QT3D3 JPMORGAN CHASE AND CO 3/300.11%USA
XS2235996217NOVARTIS FINANCE SA 9/280.11%Spanien
XS2705604234BBG01JPP1244 BANCO SANTANDER SA 10/310.11%Spanien
FR0013398070BNP PARIBAS 01/26 AW7468680.11%Frankrike
XS2180007549AT&T INC 5/280.11%Frankrike
XS2149207354GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP INC 3/250.10%USA
XS1603892149MORGAN STANLEY DEAN WITTER 04/27 AN3187610.10%USA
CH0537261858CREDIT SUISSE GROUP AG SR UNSECURED REGS 04/26 VAR 4/250.10%Schweiz

Innehav kan komma att förändras

Fortsätt läsa

Populära