Nyheter
Silver – Ripe for Recovery
ETF Securities – Silver – Ripe for Recovery
Converging trends point to a higher silver price
- The silver price has more than halved from its high in 2011, presenting good value in our view.
- With industrial demand turning up, supply falling, inventories declining, the gold price stable and volatility at a near decade low, we believe conditions are building for a silver price rally.
- Chinese silver imports have increased 17% YOY in 2014.
- Silver fabrication demand increased 6% in 2013 – the largest increase since 2000.
- Speculative shorts in the futures market are elevated, indicating scope for a short covering rally.
Silver is brewing for some shine
Silver is the one of the world’s most versatile commodities. Also classified as a currency, silver is one of the world’s best conductors of electricity and heat. Its versatility is exemplified by its use in products ranging from electronics, antiseptics, solar panels, silverware and jewellery. In the commodity ETF world, silver ETF’s have among the lowest expense ratios, notably because silver is a quasi-currency with very low storage costs yet the majority of its demand is for industrial purposes. Demand is increasing rapidly along with increasing global per-capita incomes and rapid electronization.
Total silver supply has been stagnant the past few years and, unlike gold, total silver bullion inventories have been declining for years. Often viewed by investors as a leveraged play on gold, silver is an attractive longer term portfolio diversifier in our view, with a low correlation to most other major asset classes yet offering protection from currency debasement risk and inflation.
History indicates the recent decline in silver price volatility to the lowest levels in over a decade (at the beginning of May), as measured by 30-day volatility, may be a precursor to a strong price move. In our view, downside risk is limited with industrial demand picking up and supply in decline. With the silver price less than half its 2011 peak and futures shorts already elevated, we believe the next strong trend price move is likely to be up.
Very low silver volatility indicates a brewing trend
Chinese silver imports have been strong in 2014
Demand is increasing rapidly. Q1 data on China demand showed a 22% YOY increase in silver imports, the largest quarterly gain since Q2 2010. China demand through April showed a 17% increase YOY. Every major area of silver demand is expected to increase in 2014, with the exception of photography.
In 2014, the amount of demand for silver used in solar PV panels is expected to equal the demand for photography for the first time. Exemplifying the changing demand landscape for solar, in some parts of the world, solar power is near parity on a cost-per-watt basis with conventional forms of electricity production. This trend is likely to accelerate in our view, and more so as electricity storage technology improves, notably with potential help from people like Elon Musk and his plans for battery giga factories. Silver for solar will likely consume about 78 million ounces of silver in 2014, or 8% of total demand including investment, up from less than 1% in 2007 (CPM Group estimates).
Electronization is rapidly changing our lives, notably for the the 4 billion people identified by the World Bank from roughly 70 countries in the rapidly growing US $4,000 to $11,000 per-capita income category, where consumer product consumption often increases more rapidly than per capita income enough to make it impractical to recycle, thus most silver used in electronics is removed from the market permanently, unless prices reach such levels to make such recycling economical. In 2013, about 288 million ounces of silver was used for electronics and solar; about 1/3 of total demand. In 1999, only about 11% of total silver demand was for electronics and solar.
Silver fabrication demand has shifted towards electronics
Silver futures trading in China has soared. In 2013, silver traded on the Shanghai Futures Exchange (SHFE) exceeded COMEX/CME traded silver futures in terms of total trading volume. Only open since 2012, SHFE traded silver futures were responsible for 49% of total futures trading in 2013, which was about 84 billion ounces.
Fabrication demand in 2013 increased the most since 2000. The single largest category of demand for silver is for jewelry and & silverware, making up about 31% of fabrication demand and 27% of total demand and investment in 2013. Total fabrication demand increased 6.3% in 2013 to 866 million ounces, led by jewelry, silverware and solar. It was the largest percentage increase in fabrication demand since the year 2000. Compare this to mining supply of 741 million ounces, which increased 4.1% in 2013. Recycling and inventory depletion are therefore necessary to meet the supply and demand imbalance in the silver market. A key question is, was 2013 a one-off or is it potentially the beginning of a trend? In our view, the longer-term demand trend is likely to accelerate, based notably on global per capita income and GDP growth, rapid electronization and more recent investment trends in silver. The CPM Group expects fabrication demand to increase about 3% in 2014.
Investment demand continues to grow. At the end of 2013, the total holdings of silver in ETPs (exchange traded products) stood at 623 million ounces, which although was down about 2% from the peak, was the greatest year-end amount ever for silver ETP’s holdings. Although gold ETP holdings have declined about one-third from the peak at the end of 2012, silver investors in coins, ETP’s and jewelry have been much more resilient. At the end of April 2014, silver ETP holdings increased 1.4% from the end of 2013 to 632 million ounces.
Silver ETF holdings have been steady
Led by India, identifiable investment in silver leaped 75% in 2013 to a new high of 246 million ounces. Demand for silver was boosted in 2013 in India, notably due to the sharp price decline and gold market restrictions.
Global demand for silver coins increased to a record 136 million ounces in 2013. The US mint alone sold 43 million ounces of silver coins in 2013. It was record year, with sales increasing 27% from the previous year, likely supplemented by the sharp decline in the silver price but the amount of demand exceeded the total of 35 million ounces of silver mined in the US in 2013. Although many of the coins sold by the US Mint are to non-US citizens, the Mint must purchase silver from only US miners. Currently, the US Mint alone is consuming over 100% of all silver mined in the US. As of the end of April 2014, US mint silver coin sales were on pace to match the record year of 2013, whereas gold coin sales were down about 80%.
Demand must be offset by recycling and inventory depletion
Total supply has been stagnant. A key factor holding back silver prices the past few years in our view has been increasing mining supply. The majority of silver is produced as a by-product of gold, zinc, lead and copper.
About 25% of silver was from primary silver mines in 2013. Global mining supply increased 4% in 2013 to 741 million ounces but total supplies actually declined about 2.5% to 971 million ounces due to a sharp reduction in recycling. Secondary supply, notably recycling, in 2013 was the lowest since 1999 indicating the second most significant source of supply, next to mining, is not likely to increase unless the silver price increases. Total silver supply is expected to increase only about 0.7% in 2014 unless higher prices spur increased recycling.
The total market supply of silver in 2013 was essentially the same as in 2009; only 2% above the 952 million ounces of 2009 total market supply. Unlike gold, there is not a massive amount of stored silver to call upon when demand is strong, or supplies constrained. Silver is notably a demand story.
The 2013 year was the first that total silver demand and investment demand exceeded total supply including recycling since 2010. In 2014, the supply/demand deficit is expected to widen.
2014 supply is likely to be unchanged from 2010
Inventories are quite low relative to history. In 1990, estimated total silver bullion inventories were about 2.8-billion ounces, roughly equal to about 7 times global annual mining supply. A the end of 2013, estimated total silver bullion inventories were about 890-million ounces, which is only about 1.2-times global annual mining supply. Compared to the end of the year 2000, total silver bullion inventories at the end of 2013 were down 28%.
70% of silver inventories are in ETP’s
At the end of 2013, silver ETP holdings accounted for about 70% of estimated readily available silver bullion inventories, compared to a fractional amount in the year 2000. Due to their transparency, efficiency and cost effectiveness, ETPs are increasingly becoming a larger part of the silver market, yet as 2013 proved, ETP silver holdings may be more sticky than previously expected. Governments have sold off most of their silver reserves and much of the silver has been used for industrial purposes, unlikely to ever re-enter the marketplace.
Silver inventories have been depleted by 2/3’s since 1990
The silver price is the lowest vs the cost of production since 2005. Due to the nature of silver mining, most of it is produced as by-product from the production of other metals, it is difficult to estimate total all-in production costs but we can properly measure the cash costs of the primary miners.
For the first year since 2002, primary silver cash mining costs declined in 2013, to approximately US $9.7/oz. according to the CMP Silver 2014 Handbook. The Silver Institute World Silver Survey 2014, indicated a lower cash cost amount of US $9.27/oz. Cash mining costs declined in 2013 notably due to reduced research and exploration expenditures which has negative implications for future supplies. Partly because cash costs are only a portion of total all-in costs, the silver price has historically traded a fair amount above this cost measure. At the end of 2013, the silver price was 145% above the primary miner cash cost average, which was the lowest percentage since 110% at the end of 2005.
Silver price has declined sharply relative to production costs
Silver appears cheap relative to gold. Just prior to the big silver move beginning in 2009 near US $20/oz. and ending at US $48/oz. in 2011, the gold/silver ratio was about 70, which is near current levels. This period was also preceded by a sharp decline in 30-day silver volatility similar to levels reached at the end of April this year. For the few years prior the 2008 crisis, the gold/silver ratio hovered around 50. Since 2008, the ratio has reached a peak near 85 and low near 32. With a median near 59, as the global economy continues to recover, the 50 area in the gold/silver is an area that is likely to be revisited in our view, with silver price upside the key driver.
Gold vs silver has reached the highest level since 2010
Silver – a leveraged play on gold. Silver prices have a history of moving with a higher volatility than gold but with a high correlation. Among all precious metals prices, the correlation between silver and gold is the highest. From January 2000 to April 2014, the gold silver correlation was .75. Gold’s average annual volatility was 17.5% compared to 32% for silver (measured on a monthly basis). On a volatility weighted basis, silver has moved approximately 1.8 times gold, thus it has offered a similar exposure as gold but with more return (and loss) for a given level of investment. From 1971 to 2013, the beta of silver to US CPI was 9 compared to about 5 for gold (measured annually). When gold is the main price driver, as measured during the top 20% and bottom 20% of gold return months from Jan 2000 to April 2014, silver has moved on average 1.4 times gold. When silver is the driving force, it has moved about 2.4 times the price of gold, as measured by the top 20% and bottom 20% of silver months (see table).
Due to its larger industrial demand base, silver has a higher correlation to global GDP growth and the S&P 500 than gold, but the overall correlation to both remains quite low. During positive months in the S&P 500 coinciding with global PMI above 50, silver has increased on average about 3% per month, compared to 1.4% for gold and 3% for copper. During negative S&P 500 months coinciding with global PMI below 50, silver has on average declined 0.3% per month compared to an increase of 0.6% for gold and a 1.0% decline for copper.
Summary
In our view, the silver price is potentially poised for a strong upward move. Supply and demand indicators are turning price positive. Increasing demand from China, increasing investor demand and strong fabrication demand are being met with falling supply and dwindling inventories. The gold price decline last year weighed heavily on silver due to its high correlation to the metal and its much higher volatility. However, we believe the gold price has found a bottom and this weight should be removed from silver’s performance in 2014. Unlike gold, above ground available supplies of silver have been declining for years as fabrication demand has increased. The recent rise in US and China industrial indicators, a clearing of silver longs in the futures markets and elevated shorts increases the likelihood of a short covering rally that potentially sparks a more sustained upward rise of the silver price.
Monthly performance table
Table note – End of month data is from Jan. 2000 thru April 2014. Gold and silver are spot changes. Copper is the COMEX/CME front futures change. Storage costs are not included. Total return is used for the S&P 500. The JPM Global PMI measure was used for global PMI.
Source: ETF Securities, Bloomberg.
Important Information
This communication has been issued and approved for the purpose of section 21 of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 by ETF Securities (UK) Limited (”ETFS UK”) which is authorised and regulated by the United Kingdom Financial Conduct Authority (”FCA”).
As April winds down, markets remain on edge, with escalating tariffs and renewed trade tensions keeping volatility in focus. In this summary of our full-length newsletter, we spotlight gold and gold equities, both of which have surged to record levels. We also take a step back from the day-to-day noise in crypto to explore the broader shifts in the regulatory landscape in our latest Whitepaper and present Celestia in detail. Finally, we assess how Moat indexes have held up and evolved amid the turbulence.
Your VanEck Europe team wishes you a great read.
Featured Articles
🥇 Are Gold Mining Equities Regaining Attention Amid Rising Gold Prices?
Gold & Gold mining equities tend to shine during stress periods
Source: VanEck, World Gold Council.
Gold has attracted renewed interest from investors amid concerns about inflation, currency volatility, and overall market uncertainty. Gold mining companies have recently reported improved profit margins and cash generation, with some initiating share buybacks and maintaining relatively strong balance sheets. Despite these developments, many continue to trade below their historical valuation averages.
While historical trends indicate that gold and gold mining equities have outperformed during certain periods of market stress, these patterns may not repeat under different economic conditions. Performance can be influenced by a range of factors including interest rates, central bank policy, geopolitical developments, and investor sentiment.
→ Read more
⚖️ Whitepaper Highlights: How New Crypto Regulations May Shape the Future
Cryptocurrencies are entering a new era. With the re-election of Donald Trump and the implementation of the European Union’s Markets in Crypto-Assets (MiCA) regulation, digital assets are moving into a landscape defined not just by innovation, but also by regulatory clarity.
MiCA’s structured and transparent approach aims to promote legitimacy, safeguard investors, and enhance trust in digital asset markets across Europe. It could also serve as a blueprint for other jurisdictions looking to regulate crypto effectively.
→ Read the Whitepaper Highlights
⛓️ Introduction to Celestia
Most blockchains, like Ethereum or Bitcoin, are monolithic which means they perform all major functions (consensus, data availability, and execution) on a single layer. This design ensures security but according to new modular networks, limits scalability and flexibility.
The modular blockchain thesis, which Celestia is leading, proposes separation of layers and respective responsibilities in the network.
→ Read more
Note: This article in not accessible to our UK readers.
🌊 Riding the Gold Wave
Chasing the Vein: Fund Flows into Gold Miners
Source: Mining.com. Data as of 21 March 2025. Note: Data covers 493 funds with combined assets under management of $62 billion.
U.S. equity markets experienced significant declines during the month of March. Meanwhile, spot gold price recorded new all-time highs, surpassing the $3,000 per ounce mark on 14 March and closing at a record price of $3123.57 on March 31, a 9.30% ($265.73) monthly gain. As of 31 March, gold prices have risen by 93.61% over the past five years (1). Investors should keep in mind that past performance is not representative of future results.
The gold miners, as represented by the NYSE Arca Gold Miners Index (GDMNTR), outperformed significantly, up 15.51% during March (2). This gain reflects both their operational leverage to rising gold prices and market perceptions of relative value. However, gold miners can also be subject to heightened volatility, operational risks, and sensitivity to commodity price swings.
While gold and gold equities may serve as diversifiers in a portfolio due to their historically low correlations with many asset classes, investors should remain mindful of the inherent risks, including price volatility, currency movements, and shifts in investor sentiment that can lead to rapid reversals in performance.
→ Read more
🌪️ Moat Stocks Weather Tariff Tumble
Market turbulence in March weighed on stocks. The Moat Index was not immune to the market turmoil, as it declined along with the broad U.S. equity market ending the month lower. However, the Moat Index showed resilience relative to the S&P 500—thanks in part to defensive sector resilience and underweight exposure to mega-caps.
At the same time, the SMID Moat Index lagged small and mid-caps in March. Smaller U.S. stocks were also impacted by global trade tensions and economic growth concerns with the broad small- and mid-cap benchmarks falling during the month. However, year-to-date, the SMID Moat Index remains ahead of the broader small- and mid-cap markets.
This is a preview of our monthly ETF insights email newsletter.
To receive the full version, sign up here.
(1) Source: World Gold Council, ICE Data Services, FactSet Research Systems Inc.
(2) Source: Financial Times.
IMPORTANT INFORMATION
This is marketing communication. Please refer to the prospectus of the UCITS and to the KID/KIID before making any final investment decisions. These documents are available in English and the KIDs/KIIDs in local languages and can be obtained free of charge at www.vaneck.com, from VanEck Asset Management B.V. (the “Management Company”) or, where applicable, from the relevant appointed facility agent for your country.
For investors in Switzerland: VanEck Switzerland AG, with registered office in Genferstrasse 21, 8002 Zurich, Switzerland, has been appointed as distributor of VanEck´s products in Switzerland by the Management Company. A copy of the latest prospectus, the Articles, the Key Information Document, the annual report and semi-annual report can be found on our website www.vaneck.com or can be obtained free of charge from the representative in Switzerland: Zeidler Regulatory Services (Switzerland) AG, Neudtadtgasse 1a, 8400 Winterthur, Switzerland. Swiss paying agent: Helvetische Bank AG, Seefeldstrasse 215, CH-8008 Zürich.
For investors in the UK: This is a marketing communication targeted to FCA regulated financial intermediaries. Retail clients should not rely on any of the information provided and should seek assistance from a financial intermediary for all investment guidance and advice. VanEck Securities UK Limited (FRN: 1002854) is an Appointed Representative of Sturgeon Ventures LLP (FRN: 452811), which is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) in the UK, to distribute VanEck´s products to FCA regulated firms such as financial intermediaries and Wealth Managers.
This information originates from VanEck (Europe) GmbH, which is authorized as an EEA investment firm under MiFID under the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive (“MiFiD). VanEck (Europe) GmbH has its registered address at Kreuznacher Str. 30, 60486 Frankfurt, Germany, and has been appointed as distributor of VanEck products in Europe by the Management Company. The Management Company is incorporated under Dutch law and registered with the Dutch Authority for the Financial Markets (AFM).
This material is only intended for general and preliminary information and shall not be construed as investment, legal or tax advice. VanEck (Europe) GmbH and its associated and affiliated companies (together “VanEck”) assume no liability with regards to any investment, divestment or retention decision on the basis of this information. The views and opinions expressed are those of the author(s) but not necessarily those of VanEck. Opinions are current as of the publication date and are subject to change with market conditions. Information provided by third party sources is believed to be reliable and have not been independently verified for accuracy or completeness and cannot be guaranteed.
Morningstar® Wide Moat Focus IndexSM, Morningstar® US Sustainability Moat Focus Index, Morningstar® US Small-Mid Cap Moat Focus IndexSM, and Morningstar® Global Wide Moat Focus IndexSM are trademarks or service marks of Morningstar, Inc. and have been licensed for use for certain purposes by VanEck. VanEck’s ETFs are not sponsored, endorsed, sold or promoted by Morningstar, and Morningstar makes no representation regarding the advisability of investing in the ETFs. Morningstar bears no liability with respect to the ETFs or any securities.
Effective December 15, 2023, the carbon risk rating screen was removed from the Morningstar® US Sustainability Moat Focus Index. Effective December 17, 2021, the Morningstar® Wide Moat Focus IndexTM was replaced with the Morningstar® US Sustainability Moat Focus Index. Effective June 20, 2016, Morningstar implemented several changes to the Morningstar® Wide Moat Focus Index construction rules. Among other changes, the index increased its constituent count from 20 stocks to at least 40 stocks and modified its rebalance and reconstitution methodology. These changes may result in more diversified exposure, lower turnover, and longer holding periods for index constituents than under the rules in effect prior to that date.
NYSE Arca Gold Miners Index is a service mark of ICE Data Indices, LLC or its affiliates (“ICE Data”) and has been licensed for use by VanEck UCITS ETF plc (the “Fund”) in connection with the ETF. Neither the Fund nor the ETF is sponsored, endorsed, sold or promoted by ICE Data. ICE Data makes no representations or warranties regarding the Fund or the ETF or the ability of the NYSE Arca Gold Miners Index to track general stock market performance. ICE DATA MAKES NO EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, AND HEREBY EXPRESSLY DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE WITH RESPECT TO THE NYSE ARCA GOLD MINERS INDEX OR ANY DATA INCLUDED THEREIN. IN NO EVENT SHALL ICE DATA HAVE ANY LIABILITY FOR ANY SPECIAL, PUNITIVE, INDIRECT, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING LOST PROFITS), EVEN IF NOTIFIED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES. ICE Data Indices, LLC and its affiliates (“ICE Data”) indices and related information, the name “ICE Data”, and related trademarks, are intellectual property licensed from ICE Data, and may not be copied, used, or distributed without ICE Data’s prior written approval. The Fund has not been passed on as to its legality or suitability, and is not regulated, issued, endorsed’ sold, guaranteed, or promoted by ICE Data.
The S&P 500 Index (“Index”) is a product of S&P Dow Jones Indices LLC and/or its affiliates and has been licensed for use by Van Eck Associates Corporation. Copyright © 2020 S&P Dow Jones Indices LLC, a division of S&P Global, Inc., and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Redistribution or reproduction in whole or in part are prohibited without written permission of S&P Dow Jones Indices LLC. For more information on any of S&P Dow Jones Indices LLC’s indices please visit www.spdji.com. S&P® is a registered trademark of S&P Global and Dow Jones® is a registered trademark of Dow Jones Trademark Holdings LLC. Neither S&P Dow Jones Indices LLC, Dow Jones Trademark Holdings LLC, their affiliates nor their third party licensors make any representation or warranty, express or implied, as to the ability of any index to accurately represent the asset class or market sector that it purports to represent and neither S&P Dow Jones Indices LLC, Dow Jones Trademark Holdings LLC, their affiliates nor their third party licensors shall have any liability for any errors, omissions, or interruptions of any index or the data included therein.
It is not possible to invest directly in an index.
Investing is subject to risk, including the possible loss of principal. Investors must buy and sell units of the UCITS on the secondary market via an intermediary (e.g. a broker) and cannot usually be sold directly back to the UCITS. Brokerage fees may incur. The buying price may exceed, or the selling price may be lower than the current net asset value. The indicative net asset value (iNAV) of the UCITS is available on Bloomberg. The Management Company may terminate the marketing of the UCITS in one or more jurisdictions. The summary of the investor rights is available in English at: complaints-procedure.pdf (vaneck.com). For any unfamiliar technical terms, please refer to ETF Glossary | VanEck.
No part of this material may be reproduced in any form, or referred to in any other publication, without express written permission of VanEck.
© VanEck (Europe) GmbH ©VanEck Switzerland AG © VanEck Securities UK Limited
April in ETFs: Gold at New Highs, Crypto in Transition, and Moat Index Holding Steady
BBVAE ETF är en spansk ETF som spårar Eurostoxx 50
The Art of Meme-ing: How Dogecoin Redefined Value
VGGF ETF köper statsobligationer från hela världen
Vilka ETFer investerar i europeiska Small Cap-aktier?
Montrose storsatsning på ETFer fortsätter – lanserar Sveriges första globala ETF med hävstång
MONTLEV, Sveriges första globala ETF med hävstång
Sju börshandlade fonder som investerar i försvarssektorn
Världens första europeiska försvars-ETF från ett europeiskt ETF-företag lanseras på Xetra och Euronext Paris
Europeisk försvarsutgiftsboom: Viktiga investeringsmöjligheter mitt i globala förändringar
-
Nyheter4 veckor sedanMontrose storsatsning på ETFer fortsätter – lanserar Sveriges första globala ETF med hävstång
-
Nyheter4 veckor sedanMONTLEV, Sveriges första globala ETF med hävstång
-
Nyheter4 veckor sedanSju börshandlade fonder som investerar i försvarssektorn
-
Nyheter4 veckor sedanVärldens första europeiska försvars-ETF från ett europeiskt ETF-företag lanseras på Xetra och Euronext Paris
-
Nyheter4 veckor sedanEuropeisk försvarsutgiftsboom: Viktiga investeringsmöjligheter mitt i globala förändringar
-
Nyheter3 veckor sedan21Shares bildar exklusivt partnerskap med House of Doge för att lansera Dogecoin ETP i Europa
-
Nyheter2 veckor sedanHANetfs Tom Bailey om framtiden för europeiska försvarsfonder
-
Nyheter1 vecka sedanFastställd utdelning i MONTDIV april 2025
