• Cryptoassets continued to be under pressure amid record outflows from global crypto ETPs
• Our in-house “Cryptoasset Sentiment Indicator” had declined significantly before reversing some of the declines more recently; The index is currently signalling neutral sentiment again
• Global crypto ETPs experienced the largest weekly net outflows ever recorded mainly driven by significant outflows from the Grayscale Bitcoin Trust (GBTC)
Chart of the Week
Performance
Last week, cryptoassets underperformed on account of increased net outflows from global Bitcoin ETPs. Last week, saw the highest weekly net outflows ever recorded and the steepest net outflows from US spot Bitcoin ETFs since trading launch.
However, most of these net outflows were concentrated in the Grayscale Bitcoin Trust (GBTC) in the US which saw more than -2 bn USD in net outflows last week while other US spot Bitcoin ETFs saw continued net inflows. Accelerating outflows from GBTC could be related to ongoing FTX or Genesis bankruptcy sales that are likely going to last only temporary.
Accelerating outflows from GBTC have clearly darkened market sentiment which had fallen to the lowest levels since January 2024 when outflows from GBTC had also worsened market sentiment.
Another factor that has contributed to a worsening sentiment in crypto markets were reports that the SEC is waging a campaign to classify Ethereum as a security.
This comes at a time when the final deadline for the approval of a spot Ethereum ETF by one of the issuers is approaching fast (23rd of May). The odds for an earlier approval by the end of May 2024 have plummeted to around 22% following these reports according to the betting website Polymarket.
The recent assessment of Ethereum by the SEC seems to be inconsistent with earlier regulatory action. The mere fact that the SEC had allowed Ethereum futures to trade on regulated exchanges was explicitly an acknowledgement that ETH is a non-security.
However, the fact that even the approval of the Bitcoin spot ETFs was a close call within the SEC (3 yea vs 2 nay) still induces a lot of uncertainty regarding the approval of the Ethereum spot ETF.
On a positive note, BlackRock has recently launched a digital asset fund (called “BUIDL”) based on the Ethereum blockchain that intends to invest into tokenized assets. This seems to be a major endorsement amid the ongoing investigations by the SEC.
Besides, the Fed decided to keep interest rates unchanged at its latest FOMC meeting which was generally interpreted as dovish forward guidance as the Fed still telegraphed around 3 rate cuts à 25 bps this year.
Meanwhile, some major central banks such as the SNB in Switzerland and the Banco de México in Mexico have already delivered their first rate cut in what appears to be an early start to a global rate cutting cycle which would be a significant tailwind for cryptoassets going forward.
In general, among the top 10 crypto assets, Toncoin, Dogecoin, and XRP were the relative outperformers.
Overall altcoin outperformance vis-à-vis Bitcoin also picked up compared to the week prior, with around 60% of our tracked altcoins managing to outperform Bitcoin on a weekly basis.
Sentiment
Our in-house “Cryptoasset Sentiment Index” had declined significantly before reversing some of the declines more recently. The index is currently signalling neutral sentiment again.
At the moment, 10 out of 15 indicators are above their short-term trend.
There were significant reversals to the upside in BTC long futures liquidation dominance and the Altseason Index.
The Crypto Fear & Greed Index remains in ”Greed” territory as of this morning.
Besides, our own measure of Cross Asset Risk Appetite (CARA) has decreased throughout the week which signals diminishing bullish sentiment in traditional financial markets.
Performance dispersion among cryptoassets has continued to decline further amid the recent correction. However, overall performance dispersion still remains slightly elevated.
In general, high performance dispersion among cryptoassets implies that correlations among cryptoassets are low, which means that cryptoassets are trading more on coin-specific factors and that cryptoassets are increasingly decoupling from the performance of Bitcoin.
At the same time, altcoin outperformance vis-à-vis Bitcoin has recently picked up compared to the week prior, with around 60% of our tracked altcoins that have outperformed Bitcoin on a weekly basis. At the same time, there was a significant underperformance of Ethereum vis-à-vis Bitcoin last week.
In general, increasing altcoin outperformance tends to be a sign of increasing risk appetite within cryptoasset markets.
Fund Flows
Last week, we saw the highest weekly net outflows ever recorded across all types of products of around -1,153.3 mn USD (week ending Friday) based on Bloomberg data.
Global Bitcoin ETPs dominated with net outflows of -1,058.3 mn USD of which -887.7 mn (net) were related to US spot Bitcoin ETFs alone. In contrast, the ETC Group Physical Bitcoin ETP (BTCE) saw net inflows equivalent to +6.6 mn USD last week.
The Grayscale Bitcoin Trust (GBTC) experienced record net outflows of approximately -2,001.4 mn USD last week. However, other US spot Bitcoin ETFs even managed to attract +1,113 mn USD (ex GBTC).
Global Ethereum ETPs also saw significant net outflows last week of around -123.6 mn USD, which represents an acceleration of outflows compared to the week prior. Meanwhile, the ETC Group Physical Ethereum ETP (ZETH) had -3.9 mn USD in net outflows, while the ETC Group Ethereum Staking ETP (ET32) also experienced some net outflows (-3.3 mn USD) last week.
Besides, Altcoin ETPs ex Ethereum again managed to attract net inflows of around +29.9 mn USD last week.
In contrast, Thematic & basket crypto ETPs experienced minor net outflows of -1.3 mn USD, based on our calculations. The ETC Group MSCI Digital Assets Select 20 ETP (DA20) defied negative market trends with minor net inflows of around +0.4 mn USD last week.
Besides, the beta of global crypto hedge funds to Bitcoin over the last 20 trading remained at around 1.03 which implies that global crypto hedge funds have currently a neutral market exposure and are neither overweight nor underweight relative to the market.
On-Chain Data
Despite the recent consolidation below 70k USD in Bitcoin, coins continue to be taken off exchanges on a net basis as BTC exchange balances have recently reached a new multiyear low.
In contrast, Ethereum has seen a steady increase in exchange balances since the beginning of March which has exerted more downside pressure more recently.
We have recently observed some bearish BTC net transfers to exchanges from very large holders (> 10 mn USD wallet size) but mid-sized ($100k-$1M) to large holders ($1M-$10M) have continued to take coins off exchanges over the past week.
However, whale transfers to exchanges have recently turned slightly positive implying net sales by whales (entities that control at least 1,000 BTC) over the past week.
The cumulative volume delta (CVD), which measures the net difference between buying and selling trade volumes, was negative with around -910 mn USD in net selling volumes over the past week. Negative US spot Bitcoin ETF fund flows were certainly a major driver of this selling volume.
Ongoing consolidation appears to be relatively likely in the short term despite the upcoming Bitcoin Halving in April. The reason is that the positive effects from the Halving only become visible around 100 days after the Halving according to our latest analyses.
If the market was trading lower, we should find support in Bitcoin near 55.4k USD as the short-term holder’s cost basis is around that price level. Short-term holders tended to capitulate whenever the price dipped below their cost basis which should provide a solid basis for a continuation of the bull market.
Futures, Options & Perpetuals
Bitcoin futures traders reduced somewhat reduced their exposure during last week while perpetual open interest was mostly flat in BTC-terms. Futures open interest on the CME also decreased last week.
Futures long liquidations spiked last week on Tuesday above 100 mn USD according to data provided by Glassnode as Bitcoin dipped below 60k USD for a short period of time. Liquidations have levelled off significantly since then.
The Bitcoin futures basis also continued to decline from the recent highs observed at the beginning of March and was at around 21.2% p.a., at the time of writing this report.
The perpetual funding rate also mostly decreased last week and has only yesterday spiked as perpetual futures traders seem to have increased their exposure somewhat over the weekend.
In contrast, Bitcoin options’ open interest increased slightly last week. The Put-call open interest continued to decline compared to last week and is now at around 0.56 as option traders seem to unwind some of their downside hedges.
Put-call volume ratios spiked only briefly last week on Thursday in a sign of increased short-term risk aversion. For every BTC call traded, there were around 0.98 in puts traded on Thursday last week.
The 25-delta BTC 1-month option skew remained elevated but generally trended down as delta-equivalent calls were trading at a higher implied volatility than puts.
However, BTC option implied volatilities continued to come off the highs recorded at the beginning of March. Implied volatilities of 1-month ATM Bitcoin options are currently at around 70.9% p.a.
Bottom Line
• Cryptoassets continued to be under pressure amid record outflows from global crypto ETPs
• Our in-house “Cryptoasset Sentiment Indicator” had declined significantly before reversing some of the declines more recently; The index is currently signalling neutral sentiment again
• Global crypto ETPs experienced the largest weekly net outflows ever recorded mainly driven by significant outflows from the Grayscale Bitcoin Trust (GBTC)
Disclaimer
Important Information
The information provided in this material is for informative purposes only and does not constitute investment advice, a recommendation or solicitation to conclude a transaction. This document (which may be in the form of a blogpost, research article, marketing brochure, press release, social media post, blog post, broadcast communication or similar instrument – we refer to this category of communications generally as a “document” for purposes of this disclaimer) is issued by ETC Issuance GmbH (the “issuer”), a limited company incorporated under the laws of Germany, having its corporate domicile in Germany. This document has been prepared in accordance with applicable laws and regulations (including those relating to financial promotions). If you are considering investing in any securities issued by ETC Group, including any securities described in this document, you should check with your broker or bank that securities issued by ETC Group are available in your jurisdiction and suitable for your investment profile.
Exchange-traded commodities/cryptocurrencies, or ETPs, are a highly volatile asset and performance is unpredictable. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance. The market price of ETPs will vary and they do not offer a fixed income. The value of any investment in ETPs may be affected by exchange rate and underlying price movements. This document may contain forward-looking statements including statements regarding ETC Group’s belief or current expectations with regards to the performance of certain asset classes. Forward-looking statements are subject to certain risks, uncertainties and assumptions, and there can be no assurance that such statements will be accurate and actual results could differ materially. Therefore, you must not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements. This document does not constitute investment advice nor an offer for sale nor a solicitation of an offer to buy any product or make any investment. An investment in an ETC that is linked to cryptocurrency, such as those offered by ETC Group, is dependent on the performance of the underlying cryptocurrency, less costs, but it is not expected to match that performance precisely. ETPs involve numerous risks including, among others, general market risks relating to underlying adverse price movements and currency, liquidity, operational, legal, and regulatory risks.
HSBC Nasdaq Global Climate Tech UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (H41V ETF) med ISIN IE000XC6EVL9, försöker följa Nasdaq CTA Global Climate Technology-index. Nasdaq CTA Global Climate Technology-index spårar företag från hela världen som arbetar med lösningar för att bekämpa klimatförändringar.
Den börshandlade fondens TER (total cost ratio) uppgår till 0,50 % p.a. HSBC Nasdaq Global Climate Tech UCITSETF USD (Acc) är den enda ETF som följer Nasdaq CTA Global Climate Technology index. Denna ETF replikerar det underliggande indexets prestanda genom full replikering (köper alla indexbeståndsdelar). Utdelningarna i ETFen ackumuleras och återinvesteras.
Denna ETF lanserades den 11 oktober 2023 och har sin hemvist i Irland.
Investeringsmål
Fonden strävar efter att så nära som möjligt följa avkastningen för NASDAQ CTA Global Climate Technology Index (indexet), samtidigt som den främjar miljömässiga, sociala och/eller styrningsegenskaper (ESG). Fonden kommer att investera i, eller få exponering mot, aktier i företag som utgör indexet. Fonden är kvalificerad enligt artikel 8 i SFDR.
Investeringspolicy
Indexet är ett modifierat börsvärdesindex som är utformat för att mäta resultatet för ett urval av företag inom den globala klimatteknikindustrin som driver övergången till en koldioxidneutral global ekonomi över aktiemarknader över hela världen, enligt indexleverantören. Företagen väljs ut för att ingå i indexet baserat på klassificering av Consumer Technology Association (CTA). Indexet är konstruerat genom att exkludera företag: involverade i produktionen av kontroversiella vapen, termiskt kol samt olja och gas.
Fonden förvaltas passivt och syftar till att investera i bolagens aktier i generellt sett samma proportioner som i Index. Fonden kan investera upp till 10 % av sina tillgångar i andra fonder, upp till 35 % av sina tillgångar i värdepapper från en enskild emittent under exceptionella marknadsförhållanden och upp till 10 % av sina tillgångar i totalavkastningsswappar och differenskontrakt. Se prospektet för en fullständig beskrivning av investeringsmålen och användningen av derivat.
Handla H41V ETF
HSBC Nasdaq Global Climate Tech UCITSETF USD (Acc) (H41V ETF) är en europeisk börshandlad fond. Denna fond handlas på flera olika börser, till exempel Deutsche Boerse Xetra och London Stock Exchange. Av den anledningen förekommer olika kortnamn på samma börshandlade fond.
Det betyder att det går att handla andelar i denna ETF genom de flesta svenska banker och Internetmäklare, till exempel DEGIRO, Nordnet, Aktieinvest och Avanza.
Som alltid med ETFer är det viktigt att veta om de index som spåras av sektor ETFer för att förstå vad du köper in dig på. Investerare kan vända sig till sektor ETF-investeringar för att konstruera sina portföljer på ett annat sätt än den mer traditionella geografiska metoden, eller för att försöka dra nytta av konjunkturcykeln genom att satsa på de sektorer som de tror kommer att överträffa, och undervikta eftersläpande.
Oavsett dina skäl till att välja sektor ETFer, är det viktigt att veta hur de investerar – vilket som alltid med ETFer innebär att förstå indexen som spåras av en sektor ETFs underliggande innehav, och hur dessa index klassificerar de tiotusentals investerarbara aktier som finns tillgängliga i olika sektorer.
Två sektorsklassificeringssystem
De främsta leverantörerna av sektorindex – MSCI och STOXX Limited – baserar sina index på ett av två olika internationellt erkända sektorsklassificeringssystem:
Global Industry Classification Standard (GICS), som delar upp 51 000 värdepapper i 11 sektorer, 24 branschgrupper, 68 branscher och 157 underbranscher.
Industry Classification Benchmark (ICB), som klassificerar 75 000 värdepapper i 10 branscher, 19 supersektorer, 41 sektorer och 114 undersektorer.
Hur sektorsklassificeringssystemen fungerar
Båda systemen är baserade på en hierarki av grupperingar – från breda sektorsklassificeringar ner till mer specialistnischer.
Du kan tänka på det som liknar hur vi klassificerar djurriket i familj, släkt, art och så vidare.
Till exempel placeras företagen, det vill säga aktier, som får majoriteten av sina intäkter från flygverksamheten av ICB-systemet.
… till undersektorn flyg- och rymdindustri
… som är en del av flyg- och försvarssektorn
… som ingår i supersektorn industriella varor och tjänster
… som sitter inom Industribranschen
Även om GICS-systemet är liknande – men absolut inte identiskt – är dess kategorinamn olika. Därför finns risken för investerare förvirring.
Den översta nivån under GICS-systemet är ’Sektor’, vilket är den tredje nivån i hierarkin under ICB-systemet. Ändå är dessa bara etiketter – ICB:s ”Industri”-nivå är funktionellt densamma som GICS ”Sector”-nivå.
Naturligtvis använder kommentatorer ordet ”sektor” för att hänvisa till alla möjliga olika branschgrupperingar, inte bara till den specifika betydelsen under GICS- eller ICB-metoderna.
Sektorer/industrier på toppnivå inom GICS och ICB i jämförelse
GICS
ICB
Energy
Oil and Gas
Materials
Basic Materials
Health Care
Health Care
Industrials
Industrials
Financials
Financials
Information Technology
Technology
Telecommunication Services
Telecommunication
Utilities
Utilities
Consumer Staples
Consumer Goods
Consumer Discretionary
Consumer Services
Real Estate
–
Uppe i luften
Även om de två klassificeringssystemen ytligt sett är ganska lika, finns det några verkliga skillnader när du gräver ner i hur de kategoriserar vissa branscher – och därav var dessa branscher sitter i sina respektive grupperingar.
Till exempel placerar ICB flygbolag i sin rese- och fritidssektor.
Däremot har GICS-systemet flygbolag i sin Airlines Industry-kategori, som är en del av dess Transportation Industry Group.
Det betyder inte att den ena kategoriseringen är bättre än den andra – och vi kan helt klart inte gå igenom alla skillnader mellan dessa system här.
Snarare vill vi belysa varför du behöver undersöka en ETF grundligt innan du köper den för att säkerställa att den kommer att exponera dig korrekt för resultatet av den typ av aktier du letar efter.
Sektorer, regioner och optimerade ETFer
Rent praktiskt, även om de djupare nivåerna i sektorklassificeringshierarkierna är viktiga att känna till, är det bara de högre nivåerna av GICS och ICB som faktiskt kan investeras genom ETFer. Sektor ETFer finns i regionala och globala smaker. Till exempel har Xtrackers sektor ETFer fokuserade på MSCI Emerging Markets basindex, såväl som MSCI World. Det finns också sektor-ETFer som spårar ”optimerade” och ”begränsade” versioner av vissa index.
ETFer som spårar dessa optimerade index kan erbjuda riskhanteringsfördelar jämfört med ETFer som spårar standardindex, eftersom de begränsar den totala exponeringen som fonden kommer att ha mot ett företag.
Investerare kan också föredra dem för den potentiellt överlägsna likviditeten i deras underliggande innehav.
Amundi JPX Nikkei 400 UCITSETF Daily Hedged USD (JPHU ETF) med ISIN LU1681039217, försöker följa JPX-Nikkei 400 (USD Hedged) index. JPX-Nikkei 400 Daily (USD Hedged)-index spårar 400 japanska aktier. Aktierna väljs i huvudsak utifrån avkastning på eget kapital och ackumulerat rörelseresultat. Valuta säkrad till US-dollar.
Den börshandlade fondens TER (total cost ratio) uppgår till 0,18 % p.a. Amundi JPX Nikkei 400 UCITSETF Daily Hedged USD är den billigaste och största ETF som följer JPX-Nikkei 400 (USD Hedged) index. ETFen replikerar resultatet för det underliggande indexet syntetiskt med en swap. Utdelningarna i denna ETF ackumuleras och återinvesteras.
Amundi JPX Nikkei 400 UCITSETF Daily Hedged USD är en liten ETF med tillgångar på 48 miljoner euro under förvaltning. Denna ETF lanserades den 28 maj 2015 och har sin hemvist i Luxemburg.
Investeringsmål
AMUNDI JPX-NIKKEI 400 UCITSETF – DAILY HEDGED USD (C) försöker replikera så nära som möjligt utvecklingen av utvecklingen av det yendenominerade JPX-Nikkei 400-indexet (återinvesterade nettoutdelningar), oavsett om trenden är stigande eller fallande och har en månatlig valutasäkring i USD. Denna ETF gör det möjligt för investerare att dra nytta av en exponering mot ett urval av japanska aktier utvalda enligt kvantitativa kriterier och kvalitativa kriterier för bolagsstyrning, och viktade enligt deras börsvärde.