Följ oss

Nyheter

Gold Sets a High Bar for Bitcoin

Publicerad

den

Gold Sets a High Bar for Bitcoin, Gold bullion rallied 2.25% in July despite heavy gold bullion ETP redemptions, while gold stocks moved slightly higher.

Gold Sets a High Bar for Bitcoin, a Gold Commentary July by Joe Foster, Portfolio Manager/Strategist

Key Takeaway

  • Gold bullion rallied 2.25% in July despite heavy gold bullion ETP redemptions, while gold stocks moved slightly higher.
  • We see $1,200 as a resilient floor for gold, with prices yet to trend through $1,300. The most obvious catalyst is likely to be U.S. economic weakness, which might persuade the Fed to turn cautious.
  • Investors are eager to understand digital currencies like bitcoin. We evaluate this ”fad” in the context of time-tested gold investing.
    The most significant development that has come out of the digital currency craze is validation of distributed ledger technology.

Gold Bullion Rallies in July

The monthly low for gold came on July 10 at $1,204 per ounce. Gold then rallied to finish July at $1,269.44 per ounce, a gain of $27.89 (2.25%; YTD gold bullion has gained 10.17%). This was the third time this year that gold has successfully tested the $1,200 level. Although the U.S. dollar had a precipitous fall in July, it was not the primary driver for gold. Thus far in 2017 gold has been responding more to changes in real interest rates. Gold has an inverse correlation to real interest rates, which moved higher early in the month (coinciding with gold lows) before trending lower. The change in direction for gold and interest rates was driven by somewhat dovish Congressional testimony by Federal Reserve Chair Janet Yellen, which the market interpreted as an indication that another Fed rate increase this year is less likely.

July Gains Impressive Given ETP Redemptions

July saw heavy redemptions in the gold bullion exchange traded products. Physical demand from Asia is typically low during the summer and there were not any significant moves in futures positioning. Normally this would contribute to price weakness, so July’s modest gains for gold are somewhat impressive. It is possible that July’s gains were driven by buying in the over-the-counter market (OTC), however there is no published data for OTC transactions. We do expect that more transparency for the OTC market will be available soon. The London Bullion Market Association (LBMA) and the London Precious Metals Clearing Limited (LPMCL) recently began releasing aggregate data on gold inventories in London vaults with a three month lag. Vaulting statistics are a first step and are likely to be followed by trade reporting at a later date.

Gold stocks moved slightly higher with the gold price. For July, the NYSE Arca Gold Miners Index (GDMNTR) gained 3.6% while the MVIS Global Junior Gold Miners Index (MVGDXJTR) advanced 0.20%. Gold stocks advanced despite heavy redemptions in gold stock ETFs, a situation that parallels the curious July relationship between the rising gold price and the gold bullion ETP redemptions. Markets don’t always do what is expected of them.

Recent Momentum Suggests that $1,300 is Likely to be Tested

While $1,200 has proven to be a resilient floor for gold, the price has yet to trend through the $1,300 per ounce level. Twice this year gold turned down as it approached $1,300. The recent upward price trend suggests $1,300 may soon be tested for a third time. Gold prices typically trend higher in the fall as seasonal physical demand improves. In terms of identifying catalysts that might enable gold to break through $1,300, the most obvious candidate is economic weakness that might persuade the Fed to take a more cautious stance. The Fed is expected to announce plans in September to reduce its massive crisis-era balance sheet and there could also be significant risks surrounding these plans.

Gold is Physical, Bitcoin is Digital

Recently, we have received many questions about digital currencies and in particular, bitcoin (defined as the world’s first decentralized digital currency). The queries range from our general opinion to concerns that bitcoin might displace gold demand. While we have no digital currency experts on our gold team, we follow the development of these new currencies with interest. It is clear that those who promote bitcoin are using gold’s image to help validate their product. Press articles are often accompanied by a picture of stacks of shiny gold colored bitcoins. Bitcoins are created by “miners”. This is aimed at creating the illusion of a solid currency. In reality, digital currencies are strings of 0s and 1s stored in a computer in some unknown location and cannot be touched or seen.

There are, however, several important similarities between gold and bitcoin. Both are outside of the mainstream financial establishment. Both are not issued or controlled by governments, and both are traded around the globe across borders. Supply of both gold and bitcoin is limited, so they are sound forms of currency. For most transactions to be used in an economy, they must be converted into paper currency.

Gold versus Bitcoin

However, there are a range of significant differences:

  • Gold has been established as a store of wealth throughout human history. Gold’s market capitalization is roughly $8 trillion, of which $3 trillion is in coin and bar form. Approximately $50 billion worth of gold trades each day. Bitcoin is microscopic in comparison with a market capitalization of approximately $45 billion and $1.5 billion in daily trading volume.
  • Gold can be stored anywhere. If stored at home, it can be used for barter the next time a hacker or solar flare takes down the grid. Digital currencies are worthless without electricity. Taking delivery will always be impossible with digital currency.
  • Bitcoin mining is a difficult concept to fathom. Bitcoin miners use computer programs to solve complex math problems and receive in exchange new bitcoins. What does this activity have to do with creating a store of wealth?
  • Most bitcoin markets are lightly regulated and are located outside of the U.S. A major potential drawback to digital currency is their use for money laundering, illegal trading, computer ransom attacks, tax avoidance, and to subvert exchange controls. Expect governments to intervene heavily if any of these activities become significant. Over the past year the People’s Bank of China (PBOC) forced the three biggest bitcoin exchanges to adhere to anti-money laundering rules, implement trading fees, and then forced them to halt bitcoin withdrawals.
  • Distributed ledgers are promoted as unhackable. However, police were recently able to find the digital keys to an online criminal’s accounts and seize approximately $8 million in digital currencies.
  • Digital currency has yet to stand the test of time. We do not know if a digital currency that is secure today will be secure under new technology. Distributed ledger passwords could be relatively easily broken if quantum computing becomes a reality.

Distributed Ledger Technology is Game Changing

The most significant development that has come out of the digital currency craze is validation of distributed ledger technology. This technology has the potential to revolutionize many aspects of the financial system, trade, and essentially anything where records are maintained. A secure system that eliminates middle men has obvious advantages. Imagine trading stocks without brokers, transfer agents, and custodians ― a scenario where fees are likely to disappear.

Source: Capco.com.
Equally as significant, digital currencies have caused many to question what exactly a currency should be and whether there is a better alternative to fiat currency. The monetary system is broken. Central banks seem powerless to prevent the economy from going through busts that destroy wealth and create hardship. Currency volatility under the fiat system has been extreme. Politics, corruption, and mismanagement are a constant concern.

Technology Likely to Improve Gold Ownership Efficiency

Combining distributed ledger technology with an established sound and solid currency may provide the best alternative. To this end, later in 2017 the Royal Mint in the U.K. is set to launch Royal Mint Gold (RMG). RMG will be a digital record of ownership for gold stored at its vault, while CME Group will operate the product’s distributed ledger platform. It will carry the option to convert to physical gold. It is not clear whether this product will enable consumer purchases with some type of RMG credit card. Regardless, technology is accelerating towards the day when gold can be used both as a store of wealth and an efficient medium of exchange.

Digital Currencies Are Not Likely to Replicate Gold’s Unique Role

Bitcoin and other digital currencies are a fad that has attracted the attention of programmers, speculators, and early adaptors. Given the fundamental characteristics of gold and digital currencies, we do not believe digital currencies will ever replicate or replace gold’s unique role as a form of portfolio insurance and as a hedge against tail risk. It is my opinion that governments will not allow digital currencies to reach the critical mass needed to challenge the utility of fiat currencies. At best, digital currencies may eventually occupy some middle ground as a niche product. At worst, they become a failed experiment that ends in tears. For now, the only thing we can forecast with confidence in the digital currency space is more volatility.

by Joe Foster, Portfolio Manager and Strategist

With more than 30 years of gold industry experience, Foster began his gold career as a boots on the ground geologist, evaluating mining exploration and development projects. Foster is Portfolio Manager and Strategist for the Gold and Precious Metals strategy.

Please note that the information herein represents the opinion of the author and these opinions may change at any time and from time to time.

Important Information

1 U.S. Dollar Index (DXY) indicates the general international value of the U.S. dollar. The DXY does this by averaging the exchange rates between the U.S. dollar and six major world currencies: Euro, Japanese yen, Pound sterling, Canadian dollar, Swedish kroner, and Swiss franc.

2 The correlation coefficient is a measure that determines the degree to which two variables’ movements are associated and will vary from -1.0 to 1.0. -1.0 indicates perfect negative correlation, and 1.0 indicates perfect positive correlation.

3 NYSE Arca Gold Miners Index (GDMNTR) is a modified market capitalization-weighted index comprised of publicly traded companies involved primarily in the mining for gold.

4 MVIS Global Junior Gold Miners Index (MVGDXJTR) is a rules-based, modified market capitalization-weighted, float-adjusted index comprised of a global universe of publicly traded small- and medium-capitalization companies that generate at least 50% of their revenues from gold and/or silver mining, hold real property that has the potential to produce at least 50% of the company’s revenue from gold or silver mining when developed, or primarily invest in gold or silver.

5 Black swan is an event or occurrence that deviates beyond what is normally expected of a situation and is extremely difficult to predict.

6 VIX is the ticker symbol for the Chicago Board Options Exchange (CBOE) Volatility Index, which shows the market’s expectation of 30-day volatility. It is constructed using the implied volatilities of a wide range of S&P 500 index options.

Important Disclosures

This commentary originates from VanEck Investments Limited (“VanEck”) and does not constitute an offer to sell or solicitation to buy any security.

VanEck’s opinions stated in this commentary may deviate from opinions presented by other VanEck departments or companies. Information and opinions in this commentary are based on VanEck’s analysis. Any forecasts and projections contained in the commentary appear from the named sources. All opinions in this commentary are, regardless of source, given in good faith, and may only be valid as of the stated date of this commentary and are subject to change without notice in subsequent versions of the commentary. Any projections, market outlooks or estimates in this material are forward-looking statements and are based upon certain assumptions that are solely the opinion of VanEck. Any projections, outlooks or assumptions should not be construed to be indicative of the actual events which will occur.

Fortsätt läsa
Annons
Klicka för att kommentera

Skriv en kommentar

Din e-postadress kommer inte publiceras. Obligatoriska fält är märkta *

Nyheter

Regulatory Crackdowns and Ethereum’s Most Anticipated Application

Publicerad

den

Regulatory Crackdowns Fire Up in April Macro Uncertainty, Geopolitical Headwinds, and Bitcoin’s Fourth Halving Ethereum’s Most Anticipated Application

• Regulatory Crackdowns Fire Up in April

• Macro Uncertainty, Geopolitical Headwinds, and Bitcoin’s Fourth Halving

• The Arrival of Ethereum’s Most Anticipated Application

Macro Uncertainty, Geopolitical Headwinds, and Bitcoin’s Fourth Halving

April brought a challenging landscape for Bitcoin. Geopolitical tensions flared in the Middle East when Israel targeted the Iranian Consulate in Syria on the 1st of April. In an unprecedented response, Iran retaliated directly with a drone strike against Israel, intensifying hostilities. The event contributed to a decline in the stock market and a temporary pullback in Bitcoin’s price. As mentioned two weeks ago, although Bitcoin historically served as a safe haven during crises like the Russian Invasion of Ukraine, its response to Iran-Israeli escalation may have been adverse.

However, a closer look at the market reveals a more nuanced picture. The impact on Bitcoin was primarily felt in the futures market, where open interest peaked at $35 billion on the day of the Consumer Price Index (CPI) print, leading to significant liquidations when inflation came in hotter than expected for the fourth month running. Resilience in the labor market, coupled with strong domestic demand, is evidence that despite Fed efforts, the US is not yet in a position for rate cuts, which may pose further turbulence for risk-on assets. Encouragingly, long-term holders demonstrated resilience amidst escalating tensions. Unlike short-term fears reflected in futures markets, long-term holders increased their supply by 0.1% over the past week, for the first time since January, as the Israeli response seemingly coincided with a local bottom for long-term holder supply. This is a bullish signal, showcasing belief in the asset, irrespective of recent market activity. Nevertheless, we can see that BTC will continue to be stuck in the $60K – $70K range until we get more clarity on the macroeconomic and geopolitical front.

Figure 1: Bitcoin Short-Term Holder Supply vs. Long-Term Holder Supply

Source: Glassnode

Despite the macroeconomic headwinds, significant progress was made in the institutional adoption of Bitcoin. Despite a break in Blackrock’s Bitcoin ETF 71-day net inflow streak, the conclusion of the 90-day due diligence period for fund managers considering the spot ETFs revealed that over 100 institutions, such as BNY Mellon and Banco do Brazil, are exposed to Bitcoin. Morgan Stanley is also actively exploring allowing 15,000 brokers to provide this exposure to their clients. They also filed to broaden access to BTC ETFs by expanding it to 12 more funds, signifying the growing acceptance of Bitcoin by TradFi institutions. Finally, the launch of Bitcoin ETFs in Hong Kong marked a significant step towards adoption in Asia, potentially influencing other jurisdictions like South Korea, Japan, and Singapore to follow suit while expanding Bitcoin’s access to Hong Kong’s $1.15 trillion wealth management sector.

Beyond the market’s activity, April also marked a historic event for Bitcoin: the fourth halving, reducing Bitcoin’s annual inflation rate to below 1%, making it even scarcer than Gold. Historically, Bitcoin trades 50% down from its peak leading up to the halving. This year, Bitcoin defied historical trends, reaching a new all-time high prior to the halving, attributed to the surge in demand from the aforementioned US Bitcoin ETFs, coupled with ongoing technical advancements within the Bitcoin ecosystem, such as Ordinals, BRC-20s, and Runes, as touched upon in the last newsletter.

These advancements are transforming Bitcoin beyond its original vision as a purely decentralized payment network. The emergence of Ordinals and Runes has amplified on-chain activity, reflected in surging transaction fees. This is particularly beneficial for Bitcoin miners, who saw their block reward cut in half due to the halving. Higher transaction fees help compensate for this lost revenue, ensuring the continued security of the Bitcoin network. Notably, as shown in Figure 2, Bitcoin transaction fees made up 75% of Bitcoin miner revenue, soaring to $128 on the day of the halving. While the surge might have been driven by the desire to have a historical inscription, it does underscore the potential impact on miners’ revenue as Bitcoin’s on-chain ecosystem matures.

Figure 2: Bitcoin Miners Revenue

Source: 21.co on Dune

Launched in April, Runes Protocol offers a novel approach to creating fungible tokens on the Bitcoin network. It addresses inefficiencies associated with the BRC-20 standard, which have burdened the Bitcoin blockchain due to its inefficient data handling. Ultimately, Runes presents a key innovation that bolsters Bitcoin’s security budget by offering miners an alternative source of revenue, while reducing their dependence on block rewards. Runes has already rewarded miners with almost $150 million, impressively making up 80% of fees generated on the Bitcoin network on April 23, as shown below.

Figure 3: Share of Bitcoin Transaction Fees

Source: CryptoKoryo on Dune

While Bitcoin’s daily transaction volume surpassed 1 million, rivaling Ethereum’s activity, the initial excitement surrounding Runes might recede before a more long-term, sustainable surge in the network’s DeFi activity. The initial phase often focuses on meme-like tokens attracting rapid but fleeting interest. However, the development of sophisticated DeFi protocols like exchanges and Automated Market Makers (AMMs) will enhance Bitcoin’s application layer, streamlining token trading similar to what ERC-20/ERC-721 standards did for Ethereum. This paves the way for a more robust and mature DeFi ecosystem on Bitcoin, which we will closely monitor in the months to come.

Regulatory Crackdowns Fire Up in April

April saw the continued regulation-by-enforcement trend, cracking down on non-custodial infrastructure and the Ethereum ecosystem. On April 10, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) sent Wells Notices to Uniswap and Consensys for alleged violation of federal securities law. Uniswap announced its intention to resolve this through court. The details of the SEC’s Wells Notice remain unclear. However, it could have been triggered by Uniswap’s pending revenue-sharing initiative, which has had a domino effect on the ecosystem. In the short term, the crackdown could dissuade protocols from following suit, which would have incentivized their users to stake and delegate their tokens for a share of the revenue.

On April 25, Consensys filed a lawsuit against the SEC for “unlawful seizure of authority,” arguing that Ethereum is not a security nor that MetaMask is a securities broker. The recent crackdown could put a strain on the crypto infrastructure industry in the short term, as it could severely disrupt the ecosystem while encouraging companies to explore alternative jurisdictions aside from the U.S. market.

Earlier in February, the SEC adopted rules that widened its interpretation of a dealer to include “as part of a regular business” in addition to the initial definition, “any person engaged in the business of buying and selling securities . . . for such person’s own account through a broker or otherwise.” The newly adopted rules have now triggered an outcry in the crypto community, deeming the legislation too broad, as it includes average market participants in cryptoasset liquidity pools (liquidity providers), who essentially have a very different role than a broker.

For example, liquidity providers on Uniswap can be anyone, given they have the capital to deposit and earn yield, unlike professional market makers in traditional finance whose responsibilities extend beyond that. Providing liquidity on Uniswap is open to anyone to enable permissionless markets, which makes this an important characterization due to the impact it could have on how DeFi functions in the US. While the ongoing crackdown could cause uncertainty in the short term within the Ethereum ecosystem, regulatory clarity will ultimately be reached in the long run, as we’ve seen on several counts of hurdles over the past few years.

Ethereum’s Most Anticipated Application of the Year is Live

EigenLayer is finally live on Ethereum’s mainnet. It’s a new primitive that allows ETH users to “re-stake” their existing staked ETH to validate the security of external networks. EigenLayer has been eagerly anticipated as it optimizes capital efficiency by allowing users to earn additional yield on top of their native staking rewards. Further, it allows younger protocols to borrow the security assurances of Ethereum, circumventing the need to bootstrap their own security from scratch. This translates to a more cost-efficient approach while simultaneously bolstering their decentralization. Nevertheless, the protocol comes with inherent risks.

By opting to earn additional yield, users, and validators subject themselves to heightened smart contract risks as they become exposed to the vulnerabilities of both Ethereum and the additional protocols relying on its security. Moreover, a large portion of ETH could end up being “re-staked” in EigenLayer instead of just validating the security of Ethereum, creating a problem of misalignment. Simply, some validators might opt to maximize their profits by pursuing strategies that prioritize short-term gains over the long-term security of the network. Additionally, the growing enthusiasm for the protocol suggests that a significant portion of the crypto economy might rely on Ethereum’s security. Currently, 15% of all staked ETH is allocated towards Eigen’s re-staking strategy. The continuation of this trend could lead to centralization, posing a risk as Ethereum might inadvertently become a single point of failure over a longer time horizon.

Wide-spread slashing is another concern. In essence, if a substantial amount of ETH is re-staked in a singular protocol, then a slashing event due to unintended or malicious behavior could significantly impact honest ETH stakers. Thus, Eigen proposed a slashing committee comprising esteemed ETH developers and trusted community members, empowered to veto such occurrences and safeguard Ethereum’s integrity.

The final risk concerns a new breed of tokens known as Liquid re-staking Tokens (LRTs), which operate atop EigenLayer. LRTs, akin to Liquid Staking Tokens (LSTs) issued by the established Lido Protocol in 2021, aim to unlock similar capital efficiency by allowing users to use their re-staked ETH as collateral for lending and borrowing. Given that re-staked ETH in Eigen can’t be used across DeFi platforms, users have turned to LRT protocols like Ether.fi and Renzo to seek higher levels of capital flexibility, with their re-staked assets. For context, LRTs grew exponentially by a factor of 28 throughout Q1, increasing from nearly 100K units to the current figure of 2.8M, as shown in Figure 4, illustrating its soaring demand.

Figure 4: Growth of Liquid re-staking Tokens (LRTs) on EigenLayer

Source: @hahahash on Dune

While LRTs can offer amplified gains through leveraged lending, they can also exacerbate losses, increasing systemic risk in market downturns. Since some LRT protocols can’t offer withdrawals yet, users may be forced to swap their LRT tokens on thinly traded secondary markets, intensifying their decline. Last week, we saw an instance of this risk manifest when Renzo’s ezETH lost its peg. This happened as the ETH derivative experienced heavy selling on various exchanges, causing it to trade at over a 75% discount compared to ETH. This coincided with the company facing scrutiny over its controversial token distribution plan, which is scheduled to launch on April 30.

All in all, the impact of EigenLayer is not to be understated, as the excitement surrounding the new primitive has propelled it to become the second-largest protocol on Ethereum by Total Value Locked (TVL), boasting an impressive $15.6B. This already eclipses the TVL of established players like Solana by fourfold, highlighting the immense adoption that EigenLayer is witnessing despite its brief existence. Further, the excitement building up to its launch since it unveiled its roadmap in March has propelled the Ethereum validator entry queue to its highest level since October. The queue now necessitates a minimum waiting period of 8 days before new validators can join the network, as seen below in Figure 5. Nevertheless, stay tuned as we prepare to release a more in-depth exploration of EigenLayer risks over the coming weeks.

Figure 5: Ethereum Validator Entry Queue in Days

Source: ValidatorQueue

Next Month’s Calendar

Source: Forex Factory, 21Shares

Research Newsletter

Each week the 21Shares Research team will publish our data-driven insights into the crypto asset world through this newsletter. Please direct any comments, questions, and words of feedback to research@21shares.com

Disclaimer

The information provided does not constitute a prospectus or other offering material and does not contain or constitute an offer to sell or a solicitation of any offer to buy securities in any jurisdiction. Some of the information published herein may contain forward-looking statements. Readers are cautioned that any such forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve risks and uncertainties and that actual results may differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements as a result of various factors. The information contained herein may not be considered as economic, legal, tax or other advice and users are cautioned to base investment decisions or other decisions solely on the content hereof.

Fortsätt läsa

Nyheter

ETC Group lanserar BTC1, En unik Core Bitcoin ETP

Publicerad

den

BTC1 är en bäst-i-klassen Bitcoin ETP utformad för benchmark-fokuserade långsiktiga investerare. ETC Group tillkännagav i förra veckan lanseringen av sin senaste börshandlade produkt (ETP) på Deutsche Börse XETRA. ETC Group Core Bitcoin ETP (ticker BTC1; ISIN DE000A4AER62) som har skräddarsytts specifikt för benchmarkmedvetna, långsiktiga köp-och-håll-investerare och globala institutionella investerare med utökade behov av likviditet och riskhantering. BTC1 kompletterar ETC Groups befintliga produktsortiment, som bland annat inkluderar den mest likvida och största krypto-ETP i Europa.

BTC1 är en bäst-i-klassen Bitcoin ETP utformad för benchmark-fokuserade långsiktiga investerare. ETC Group tillkännagav i förra veckan lanseringen av sin senaste börshandlade produkt (ETP) på Deutsche Börse XETRA. ETC Group Core Bitcoin ETP (ticker BTC1; ISIN DE000A4AER62) som har skräddarsytts specifikt för benchmarkmedvetna, långsiktiga köp-och-håll-investerare och globala institutionella investerare med utökade behov av likviditet och riskhantering. BTC1 kompletterar ETC Groups befintliga produktsortiment, som bland annat inkluderar den mest likvida och största krypto-ETP i Europa.

Viktiga höjdpunkter

  • Kostnadseffektiv: Med en Total Expense Ratio (TER) på 0,30 % erbjuder BTC1 en konkurrensfördel i kostnadseffektivitet.
  • Benchmark-fokuserad: BTC1 spårar det institutionella prisindexet för Bitcoin med CF Benchmarks, vilket säkerställer noggrannhet och tillförlitlighet vid spårning av Bitcoins prisrörelser.
  • Bredare och bredare primärmarknadslikviditet: Som den första reglerade globala spot-Bitcoin-produkten tillhandahåller BTC1 oöverträffad primärmarknadslikviditet, och överbryggar USA, Europa och Asien spot-BTC-likviditet under de handelsfönster som används av globalt, reglerat institutionellt kapital.
  • Tri-NAV-metodik: BTC1 introducerar en unik Tri-NAV-metodik, som erbjuder institutionella investerare ett utökat likviditetsfönster på primärmarknaden som täcker amerikanska, europeiska och asiatiska BTC-spotlikviditeter. Därför tillhandahåller emittenten, förutom börsens öppettider, tre prisbestämningar under dagen (istället för bara en) för att utöka den primära marknadens likviditet över ytterligare tidszoner. Detta innebär att institutionella investerare kan handla med sina innehav under den längsta perioden jämfört med alla andra reglerade Bitcoin spotinstrumement över hela världen på den primära marknaden. Som ett resultat kan BTC1 betraktas som den första globalt orienterade Bitcoin-spot-ETP.
  • Robust ETP-struktur: BTC1 använder samma betrodda produktstruktur som ETC Groups övriga produkter, inklusive tysk hemvist med primär notering på XETRA, 100 % fysisk uppbackning och full fungibilitet med det underliggande. Dessutom har BTC1 också en oberoende administratör, ett unikt ETP-strukturattribut som först introducerades av ETC Group 2020. Denna administratörsenhet har laglig vetorätt på alla tillgångar eller värdepappersrörelser hos ETP-utgivaren, övervakar depåbalanser och lägger totalt sett till ett extra lager säkerhet för emittentens produktekosystem.
  • Säker förvaringslösning: Tillgångar förvaras säkert hos Zodia Custody, en ledande europeisk institutionell leverantör av kylförvaring, med ett ramverk för efterlevnad och styrning av bankklass.

Varför benchmark och likviditet spelar roll

Bitcoins likviditet är enorm men fragmenterad över flera börser, vilket komplicerar prisbestämningen för investerare. CF Benchmarks har utvecklat det mest robusta riktmärket för att fånga och aggregera denna likviditet, BRR-indexet och dess amerikanska och asiatiska varianter – BRRY och BRRAP som tillsammans har blivit det mest använda riktmärket som används av reglerat institutionellt kapital, inklusive majoriteten av amerikanska spot-ETFer och CME Futures. BTC1 utnyttjar alla tre regionala varianter av detta riktmärke, vilket gör att institutionella investerare kan spåra Bitcoins rättvisa pris exakt och säkert. I slutändan, ger tillgång till tre likviditetspooler/värderingspoäng under 14 timmar (jämfört med värderingspunkt och ett 8-timmarsfönster för alla andra ETFer och ETPer globalt).

BTC1 tar itu med de likviditetsutmaningar som institutionella investerare står inför med befintliga Bitcoin ETPer, som är begränsade till traditionella börstider. Med Bitcoin-handel dygnet runt och Bitcoin Futures-handel 23/5, erbjuder BTC1 institutionella investerare en global och reglerad spot Bitcoin ETP, med för närvarande den bredaste primära marknadslikviditeten för Bitcoin ETPer globalt. Detta utökade likviditetsfönster förbättrar pristransparens och riskhanteringsförmåga för institutionella investerare.

Chanchal Samadder, produktchef på ETC Group, kommenterade, BTC1 representerar en betydande milstolpe i utvecklingen av Bitcoin-investeringsprodukter. Designad med benchmarkmedvetna och långsiktiga investerare i åtanke, erbjuder BTC1 en unik blandning av kostnadseffektivitet, noggrannhet och utökad primärmarknadslikviditet, vilket sätter en ny standard på Bitcoin ETP-marknaden.

Banar kontinuerligt vägen som Tysklands första Crypto ETP-utgivare

Tim Bevan, VD kommenterade: ETC Group vill vi driva kryptoinvesteringsbranschen framåt och lanseringen av BTC1 representerar ett unikt förslag. Med BTC1 tar vi ut den första globalt orienterade Bitcoin ETP på marknaden, med de utökade funktioner för likviditet och riskhantering som våra kunder behöver. Vi är stolta över att lansera ännu en marknad först och vi tror att BTC1 har potentialen att unikt betjäna institutionella investerare med klassens bästa egenskaper.

BTC1 kommer att kunna handlas på XETRA och många andra plattformar och kommer att läggas till HANetfs paneuropeiska ETP-distributionsplattform.

Nya tillägg till ETC Groups institutionella produktsortiment inkluderar ET32, den unika totalavkastningen Ethereum-satsning ETP kopplad till ett transparent insatsriktmärke, och DA20, den enda breda marknaden Crypto Basket ETP som spårar ett MSCI-riktmärke för digitala tillgångar bland de 20 bästa kryptovalutorna som det går att investera i.

Fortsätt läsa

Nyheter

LITM ETF ger exponering mot litium och batterier

Publicerad

den

iShares Lithium & Battery Producers UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (LITM ETF) med ISIN IE000WDG5795, försöker följa STOXX Global Lithium and Battery Producers-index. STOXX Global Lithium and Battery Producers index spårar de största företagen i världen som är aktiva inom prospektering och brytning av litium eller produktion av litiumbatterier.

iShares Lithium & Battery Producers UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (LITM ETF) med ISIN IE000WDG5795, försöker följa STOXX Global Lithium and Battery Producers-index. STOXX Global Lithium and Battery Producers index spårar de största företagen i världen som är aktiva inom prospektering och brytning av litium eller produktion av litiumbatterier.

Den börshandlade fondens TER (total cost ratio) uppgår till 0,55 procent p.a. iShares Lithium & Battery Producers UCITS ETF USD (Acc) är den enda ETF som följer STOXX Global Lithium and Battery Producers index. ETFen replikerar det underliggande indexets prestanda genom samplingsteknik (köper ett urval av de mest relevanta indexbeståndsdelarna). Utdelningarna i ETFen ackumuleras och återinvesteras.

Denna ETF lanserades den 31 oktober 2023 och har sin hemvist i Irland.

Varför LITM?

  • Ger exponering för litiumindustrins tema genom litiumgruvarbetare, tillverkare av föreningar och tillverkare av litiumbatterier”
  • Exponering för aktierelaterade värdepapper från kvalificerade utvecklade och tillväxtmarknader litiumindustrin temaföretag
  • Syftar till att utesluta företag som klassificerats som icke-kompatibla av Sustainalytics Global Standards Screening (”GSS”), som tillhandahåller en bedömning av ett företags påverkan på intressenter och i vilken utsträckning ett företag orsakar, bidrar till eller är kopplat till brott mot internationella normer och standarder.

Investeringsmål

Fondens mål är att ge investerare en totalavkastning, med hänsyn till både kapital- och inkomstavkastning, vilket återspeglar avkastningen från STOXX Global Lithium and Battery Producers Index.

Handla LITM ETF

iShares Lithium & Battery Producers UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (LITM ETF) är en börshandlad fond (ETF) som handlas på Euronext Amsterdam.

Euronext Amsterdam är en marknad som få svenska banker och nätmäklare erbjuder access till, men DEGIRO gör det.

Börsnoteringar

BörsValutaKortnamn
Euronext AmsterdamUSDLITM

Största innehav

KortnamnNamnSektorVikt (%)ISINValuta
6762TDK CORPInformationsteknologi12.74JP3538800008JPY
ALBALBEMARLE CORPMaterials8.09US0126531013USD
PLSPILBARA MINERALS LTDMaterials6.81AU000000PLS0AUD
300750CONTEMPORARY AMPEREX TECHNOLOGY LTIndustri6.49CNE100003662CNY
6758SONY GROUP CORPSällansköpsvaror5.95JP3435000009JPY
6752PANASONIC HOLDINGS CORPSällansköpsvaror5.28JP3866800000JPY
373220LG ENERGY SOLUTION LTDIndustri5.15KR7373220003KRW
006400SAMSUNG SDI LTDInformationsteknologi4.68KR7006400006KRW
SQMSOCIEDAD QUIMICA Y MINERA DE CHILEIndustri4.13US8336351056USD
AKEALLKEM LTDMaterials3.35

Innehav kan komma att förändras

Fortsätt läsa

Populära