Two bank runs, which led to a short-lived depeg of USDC, shook the crypto market overnight yet increased the total crypto market cap by 5% over the past week. Bitcoin and Ethereum increased by 7.87% and 7.12%, respectively. Factors contributing to the resistance of the two largest cryptoassets by market cap could be attributed to the emerging narrative of Bitcoin as an alternative non-state monetary system alongside its growing ecosystem along with Ethereum’s anticipated Shanghai upgrade scheduled for next month. Coming in second and third in last week’s rally, Polygon (5.31%) within scaling solutions and Lido (3.09%) among decentralized applications.
This special report gives you a timeline of what happened over the past week, explains how it affected the market, and what to expect.
Figure 1: Weekly TVL and Price Performance of Major Crypto Categories
Source: 21Shares, CoinGecko, DeFi Llama. Close data as of March 13.
Key takeaways
• Three banks out of six banks holding USDC reserves collapsed last week, including a voluntary winddown from Silvergate and a takeover of Signature Bank and Silicon Valley Bank (SVB) from US financial regulators amid insolvency fears.
• Circle disclosed that SVB holds 8% of USDC cash reserves USDC depegs over the weekend, reaching an all-time low of 87 cents.
• US regulators stepped in to protect all SVB, Signature Bank depositors, and other potentially-affected banks.
What happened?
March 8
• Silvergate Capital announced on Wednesday that it will wind down operations and liquidate its bank on the back of developments covered in our previous newsletter.
March 10
• The US witnessed its second-largest bank failure. The US Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) took control of SVB after failing to pay depositors.
• Circle disclosed that $3.3B (8%) of reserves backing its USDC remain in SVB, increasing selling pressure.
• Coinbase and Binance paused USDC/USD conversions
March 11
• USDC depegged to $0.87. Circle announced they would stand behind USDC and cover any shortfall using corporate resources, involving external capital if needed.
• USDC was collateralized 77% ($32.4 billion) with short-dated US Treasury Bills via its BlackRock’s money market fund, and 23% ($9.7 billion) with cash held at a variety of US financial institutions, including, Silvergate, Signature Bank, and SVB.
• MakerDAO launched an emergency proposal to limit exposure to USDC
Figure 2: Aggressive Swapping of USDC for USDT on Curve
Source: 21shares on Dune Analytics
• Upon Circle’s disclosure on SVB, exchanges on Ethereum like Curve experienced record-level volumes of $6.7 billion as traders hedged against the USDC debacle for Tether. March 12:
• US financial regulators took control over Signature Bank
• TheFederal Reserve, Treasury, and the FDIC issued a joint statement:
o SVB and other banks’ depositors will be made whole. SVB depositors would have access to all of their money starting Monday, March 13. The taxpayer will bear no losses associated with the resolution of Silicon Valley Bank.
o Shareholders and certain unsecured debt holders will not be protected.
March 13
• Circle’s CEO Jeremy Allaire confirmed that 100% of USDC reserves are safe and secure and that they will complete their transfer of remaining SVB cash to Bank of New York (BNY) Mellon once banks in the US are back at work after a turbulent weekend.
• USDC repegged to $1.
What to expect?
• Easing conditions to bootstrap liquidity: Banks will enjoy a slightly flexible environment allowing them to issue loans for up to one year, using bonds and treasuries as collateral, as part of the Bank Term Funding Program (BTFP).
This initiative is adopted, so the central bank doesn’t terminate its Quantitative Tightening (QT) Program and offset its efforts to dampen inflation. That said, a mild pivot from a high-interest rate to a plateauing rates regime as the liquidity tightening conditions played a role in destabilizing the banking system could come into play, evident by Goldman Sachs’s latest report. FED funds futures are now showing 60% odds of a 0 BPS rate hike in March, in conjunction with a lower estimate for the FED’s funding rate at 5.1%, down from 5.7% from last week.
Figure 3: FED Funds Futures
Source: TradingView
• Counterparty Exposure: More banks catering exclusively to Silicon Valley companies will probably be vulnerable, as last year’s worsening macro conditions have roiled the tech industry. The true extent of the contagion will likely reveal itself over the next few weeks, as the Luna and FTX contagion have demonstrated. This might make it quite challenging for crypto firms to continue operating as Signature and Silvergate provided an instant settlement network for onboarding institutions, let alone providing basic banking services. Last year’s soaring interest triggered the asset-liability maturity mismatch, and thus, more banks are prone to failure if they don’t hedge positions via swaps.
Figure 4: Unrealized Gains/Losses on Investment Securities
Source: FDIC
• Circle weather the storm: The high-interest rate environment benefits stablecoins issuers like Circle as they profit by reinvesting user fiat deposits into US treasuries. This design left them in a strong position where they could liquidate some of the bond portfolios to honor redemptions, which they’ve already begun by liquidating their short-term treasury. Further, their situation is strengthened by the fact that Circle doesn’t share profits on its deposits with token holders. Thus, Circle should be fine as long as there is an elevated circulation of the USDC and the three other banks holding custody of its assets remain solvent.
• Rising support for decentralized stablecoins: Although fiat-backed stablecoins are considered the safest, they are still centralized, as issuers can run into trouble if their hosting banks fail. Moreover, the reliance and intertwinement with the traditional financial system will continue to cast a shadow over how durable these stablecoins can be during systemic shock. Thus, the crypto economy needs a durable stablecoin that can withstand failures in the traditional banking system while at the same time providing assurances of stability that honor users’ redemptions. In that regard, there will be increased calls for new stablecoin designs backed by a mixture of high-quality, uncorrelated, and censorship-resistant assets.
For instance, Maker is discussing revamping DAI’s collateral to reduce its reliance on USDC, while FRAX is proposing to switch its backing from USDC to sfrxETH (new ETH liquid-staking derivative of Frax protocol).
• Certain service providers will pursue becoming a bank or a secure FMA: Much like WeChat and Alipay have accounts at the Chinese central bank (PBOC), Circle could also push for a similar move that would supplement their users with federal insurance that can be used to keep customers whole during turbulent times. Kraken is also moving ahead to become a bank as it secured Wyoming’s approval to become a special purpose depository institution (SPDI) back in 2020 and is now on track to launch ‘very soon’ according to the exchange’s chief legal officer.
• Increased volatility: Until new banking partners emerge, liquidity will be limited across the board, resulting in higher spreads and potential aggressive market movements. Although USDC is almost fully re-pegged and is the preferred go-to for many investors, there will be increased skepticism towards holding a fully-US-based stablecoin due to the regulatory and political risk. An outflow of stablecoins leaving the ecosystem may translate to tighter liquidity conditions. Exchanges could scramble for liquidity until they fill the gap left by the collapse and takeover of SBV, Signature, and Silvergate banks.
Figure 5: Liquidity per exchange
Source: Kaiko
• Flight-to-safety: Although Bitcoin isn’t risk-free, its decentralization traits characterize it as a safe haven since the network is independent of any governing entities and, thus from potential political and economic meddling. That said, the failure of banks has reignited BTC’s value proposition as a non-state monetary system and emerging store of value. Binance already adopted this approach as its founder articulated that the exchange will swap the remaining BUSD in the $1B industry recovery fund into native assets like BTC, ETH, BNB, and others.
Each week the 21Shares Research team will publish our data-driven insights into the crypto asset world through this newsletter. Please direct any comments, questions, and words of feedback to research@21shares.com
Disclaimer
The information provided does not constitute a prospectus or other offering material and does not contain or constitute an offer to sell or a solicitation of any offer to buy securities in any jurisdiction. Some of the information published herein may contain forward-looking statements. Readers are cautioned that any such forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve risks and uncertainties and that actual results may differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements as a result of various factors. The information contained herein may not be considered as economic, legal, tax or other advice and users are cautioned to base investment decisions or other decisions solely on the content hereof.
Explore Dogecoin’s impact on crypto, turning internet memes into cultural and financial assets.
𝕋𝕚𝕞𝕖 ℂ𝕠𝕕𝕖𝕤:
00:00 – Intro
00:27 – Where do Memes come from?
03:13 – What are some of the first Memes you remember?
10:28 – Do these things have value?
14:04 – The different types of cryptocurrencies
17:20 – How did Dogecoin start?
24:26 – What is some of the utility?
28:36 – How does it fit into the portfolio?
30:38 – Final thoughts
Research Newsletter
Each week the 21Shares Research team will publish our data-driven insights into the crypto asset world through this newsletter. Please direct any comments, questions, and words of feedback to research@21shares.com
Disclaimer
The information provided does not constitute a prospectus or other offering material and does not contain or constitute an offer to sell or a solicitation of any offer to buy securities in any jurisdiction. Some of the information published herein may contain forward-looking statements. Readers are cautioned that any such forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve risks and uncertainties and that actual results may differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements as a result of various factors. The information contained herein may not be considered as economic, legal, tax or other advice and users are cautioned to base investment decisions or other decisions solely on the content hereof.
Vanguard Global Government Bond UCITSETF EUR Hedged Accumulating (VGGF ETF) med ISIN IE000B1A2798, syftar till att följa Bloomberg Global Treasury Developed Countries Float Adjusted (EUR Hedged) index. Bloomberg Global Treasury Developed Countries Float Adjusted (EUR Hedged) index följer statsobligationer världen över utfärdade av utvecklade länder. Rating: Investment Grade. Valutasäkrad till euro (EUR).
Den börshandlade fondens TER (total expense ratio) uppgår till 0,10 % per år. Vanguard Global Government Bond UCITSETF EUR Hedged Accumulating är den billigaste och största ETFen som följer Bloomberg Global Treasury Developed Countries Float Adjusted (EUR Hedged) index. ETFen replikerar det underliggande indexets resultat genom urvalsteknik (genom att köpa ett urval av de mest relevanta indexkomponenterna). Ränteintäkterna (kupongerna) i ETF:n ackumuleras och återinvesteras.
Vanguard Global Government Bond UCITSETF EUR Hedged Accumulating är en mycket liten ETF med 5 miljoner euro förvaltade tillgångar. Denna ETF lanserades den 11 mars 2025 och har sitt säte i Irland.
Fondens mål
Fonden använder en passiv förvaltnings- – eller indexerings- – investeringsmetod genom fysiskt förvärv av värdepapper och syftar till att följa utvecklingen av Bloomberg Global Treasury Developed Countries Float Adjusted Index (”indexet”).
Fonden kommer att investera i en portfölj av statsobligationer i lokal valuta (inklusive inlösbara obligationer) från utvecklade länder (enligt indexleverantören) som i största möjliga mån består av ett representativt urval av indexets ingående värdepapper.
Indexet är utformat för att återspegla helheten av flytande justerade statsobligationer med fast ränta och investeringsgrad i lokal valuta från utvecklade länder (enligt indexleverantören). Obligationerna måste ha en löptid på minst ett år.
I mindre utsträckning kan fonden investera i liknande typer av obligationer utanför indexet, men vars risk- och avkastningsegenskaper nära liknar risk- och avkastningsegenskaperna hos indexets ingående delar eller indexet som helhet.
Fonden investerar i värdepapper som är denominerade i andra valutor än basvalutan. Valutakursförändringar kan påverka avkastningen på investeringar. Valutasäkringstekniker används för att minimera riskerna i samband med valutakursförändringar, där fonden investerar i värdepapper denominerade i andra valutor än noteringsvalutan, men dessa risker kan inte helt elimineras. Eftersom detta dokument avser en andelsklass där sådana tekniker används, visas resultatet (se ”Utveckling”) för denna andelsklass mot den valutasäkrade versionen av indexet.
Fonden strävar efter att förbli fullt investerad förutom i extraordinära marknads-, politiska eller liknande förhållanden där fonden tillfälligt kan avvika från denna investeringspolicy för att undvika förluster.
Även om fonden förväntas följa indexet så nära som möjligt, kommer det vanligtvis inte att matcha resultatet för det målinriktade indexet exakt, på grund av olika faktorer såsom kostnader som fonden ska betala och regulatoriska begränsningar. Detaljer om dessa faktorer och fondens förväntade spårningsfel anges i prospektet.
Det betyder att det går att handla andelar i denna ETF genom de flesta svenska banker och Internetmäklare, till exempel Nordnet, SAVR, DEGIRO och Avanza.
Det är välkänt att företag med mindre börsvärden, Small Cap-aktier, genererar högre avkastning på lång sikt. Men de kommer också med högre risker som investerare bör hantera effektivt. Diversifiering av investeringar med ETFer är det säkraste alternativet för en oberoende investerare att närma sig småbolagsaktier. I denna artikel tittar vi på ETFer som investerar i europeiska Small Cap-aktier. Vi har hittat 9 index som spårar europeiska småbolag som spåras av 13 olika börshandlade fonder. Den årliga förvaltningskostnaden på dessa ETFer ligger mellan 0,20 och 0,58 procent.
Det finns i huvudsak fyra index tillgängliga för att investera med ETFer i europeiska Small Cap-aktier. Denna investeringsguide för europeiska småbolagsaktier hjälper dig att navigera mellan särdragen hos EURO STOXX® Small, MSCI EMU Small Cap, MSCI Europe Small Cap, STOXX® Europe Small 200 och ETFerna som spårar dem. Det gör att du kan hitta de mest lämpliga europeiska småbolags-ETFerna för dig genom att rangordna dem enligt dina preferenser.
Den största europeiska Small Cap ETFerna mätt efter fondstorlek i EUR
EURO STOXX® Small-indexet består av små företag från det underliggande EURO STOXX®-indexet. EURO STOXX®-indexet är en delmängd av STOXX® Europe 600-indexet som endast omfattar företag från länder i euroområdet. Small caps bestäms som de 33 procent lägre företagen i det underliggande indexet rankat efter deras börsvärde. Aktierna som passerar urvalsskärmen viktas av deras fria marknadsvärde.
Metodik för EURO STOXX® Small Factsheet-metodik
88 småbolagsaktier från euroområdet
Indexomräkning sker kvartalsvis
Aktieurvalet baseras på företagens storlek
Urvalskriterier: den nedre tredjedelen av EURO STOXX®-index är vald
Indexviktat med fritt flytande marknadsvärde
MSCI EMU Small Cap-index
MSCI EMU Small Cap-index fångar småbolagsaktier i 10 utvecklade länder i euroområdet. Indexet representerar de minsta företagen (cirka 14 procent av det fria börsvärdet justerat) i MSCI EMU Investable Market Index. Aktierna som passerar urvalsskärmen viktas av deras fria marknadsvärde.
Metodik för MSCI EMU Small Cap Factsheet Metodik
399 småbolagsaktier från utvecklade länder i euroområdet
MSCI Europe Small Cap-index inkluderar småbolagsaktier från 15 utvecklade länder i Europa. Indexet representerar de minsta företagen (cirka 14 procent av det fria floatjusterade börsvärdet) i MSCI Europe Investable Market Index. Aktierna som passerar urvalsskärmen viktas av deras fria marknadsvärde.
Metodik för MSCI Europe Small Cap Factsheet Methodology
903 småbolagsaktier från utvecklade europeiska länder
Aktieurvalet baseras på börsvärde med fritt flytande värde
Urvalskriterier: minsta företag i MSCI Europe Investable Market Index
Indexviktat med fritt flytande marknadsvärde
STOXX® Europe Small 200 index
STOXX® Europe Small 200-indexet spårar de 200 minsta företagen (mätt med fritt flytande marknadsvärde) från det underliggande STOXX® Europe 600-indexet, som består av 600 europeiska företag. Aktierna som passerar urvalsskärmen viktas av deras fria marknadsvärde.
Urvalskriterier: De 200 minsta aktierna (rankade från 401 till 600) från STOXX® Europe 600-indexet väljs ut
Indexviktat med fritt flytande marknadsvärde
En jämförelse av olika ETFer som investerar i europeiska Small Cap-aktier
När man väljer en Europa Small CapETF bör man överväga flera andra faktorer utöver metodiken för det underliggande indexet och prestanda för en ETF. För bättre jämförelse hittar du en lista över alla amerikanska small cap-ETFer med information om namn, kortnamn, förvaltningskostnad, utdelningspolicy, hemvist och replikeringsmetod. För ytterligare information om respektive börshandlad fond, klicka på kortnamnet i tabellen nedan.