Följ oss
the_ad_group(12516);

Nyheter

Special Market Commentary around Celsius

Publicerad

den

The crypto market endured another brutal meltdown as Celsius - one of the biggest custodian managers within the space - announced they'll pause withdrawals due to the extreme market conditions. The company, which as recently as the 17th of May had more than $11.7B of users’ AUM, was heavily invested in multiple risky DeFi strategies. Celsius is a CeFi entity offering lucrative yields for depositors and borrowers by participating in riskier strategies such as Terra's Anchor, stakehound or badgerdao. It is estimated that they lost a figure north of $100M in the hacks that plagued the two latest aforementioned protocols, while managing to get out of UST without incurring substantial damages.

The crypto market endured another brutal meltdown as Celsius – one of the biggest custodian managers within the space – announced they’ll pause withdrawals due to the extreme market conditions. The company, which as recently as the 17th of May had more than $11.7B of users’ AUM, was heavily invested in multiple risky DeFi strategies. Celsius is a CeFi entity offering lucrative yields for depositors and borrowers by participating in riskier strategies such as Terra’s Anchor, stakehound or badgerdao. It is estimated that they lost a figure north of $100M in the hacks that plagued the two latest aforementioned protocols, while managing to get out of UST without incurring substantial damages.

On-chain forensics from the past 48 hours has also illustrated that Celsius had borrowed the DAI stablecoin against locking a WBTC position on MakerDAO, combined with holding a massive position of stETH (liquid-staking derivative of ETH) on Lido Finance worth almost $475M. The company has been topping up its loan vault with additional BTC collateral to reduce the liquidation price. On the contrary, the secondary market for trading stETH against ETH has been in turmoil as the peg broke, potentially instigating the firm to exit its derivative position at a loss.

With this brief coverage in mind, we’ll seek to provide three case scenarios for how we believe the crypto market could rebound going forward – with an exclusive focus on the two biggest assets by market cap. We’ll include the different factors and triggers that could play a role in dictating what type of recovery the industry could embark on.

TL;DR

  1. Bright spot suggesting we’re nearing the bottom lies in the fact that both BTC and ETH NUPL* have reached near-capitulation areas of previous market cycles which gradually preceded a price reversal.

Regulatory clarity could provide a way forward for the restructuring of the crypto industry so that further implosions like UST and Celsius don’t re-materialize, while ensuring proper operational oversight takes place.

  1. Bitcoin and Ethereum have strong fundamentals with continuous development and user growth including institutions over the past year, complemented by a resilient NFT market.
  2. The key potential trigger for further drawdown is Celsius’s liquidity crisis and its contagion effect. On the flip side, the merge could be the potential fuel for Ethereum to gain a wider spectrum of investors thanks to cementing its scarcity, as well as living up to the ESG standards which will help paint the asset in a more-favorable light with institutional clients.

1) Best Case — Market Bottoms and Starts to Recover

Market Market Sentiment Indicators

Bitcoin

• NUPL* is showing an upward trend. The current level at -0.01 in the capitulation phase could be a bottoming signal

• Bitcoin reserve risk* has reached the level of 2019 market bottom

• Bitcoin production cost is currently at $30,000. Miners are more inclined to hold their

Bitcoin position instead of selling it. Miners’ Bitcoin reserves have increased by 19K YTD.

Ethereum

• Total Ethereum staked on Beacon Chain has reached 12.8M (182% YTD Growth), which shows the confidence from investors towards the future of Ethereum.

Derivatives Data

Bitcoin

• $539M liquidations in Bitcoin and Futures long liquidations dominance has dropped from 81% to 78%, which could be a sign of capitulation

Future short liquidations increase, and the funding rate turns negative. A potential short squeeze could push Bitcoin prices up.

Ethereum

• $336M liquidations in Ethereum. Asset’s funding rate that has gone negative and Open interest has dropped – meaning traders could be capitulating and have closed out their positions.

Potential Market Triggers

Bitcoin

• More regulatory clarity from regulators after the crypto bill from Senator Lummis. The paper has built a foundation for future crypto regulation. Regulatory clarity can help crypto to be more accessible for retail and institutional investors.

• Another centralized lending platform BlockFi has reassured users their funds are safe. Celsius’s liquidity crisis does not represent other centralized platforms that will face the same issue.

Ethereum

• The merge helps Ethereum become less energy-intensive which can attract more institutional investors

• Continuous interest from institutions. A16z is launching a $4.5B crypto fund and Huobi launching a $1B investment arm. Huge interest in NFTs amid the crypto market crash. The NFT Market has seen a 54% increase in volume. Ethereum’s blue-chip NFT leads the chart, Bored Ape Yacht club hitting $5.8 million in sales on 13 June.

2) Neutral Case – Near the Bottom

Market Market Sentiment Indicators

Bitcoin

• NUPL* at -0.01 shows that the market hasn’t reached full capitulation. Based on the 2020 drawdown bottoming at -0.14 NUPL, the market could see further downside towards the level near -0.14 NUPL

• Bitcoin reserve risk is close to the level in 2020 (0.0011 vs. 0.0012)

Ethereum

• Daily transactions on Ethereum are at a similar level to the bottom in May 2021.

Derivatives Data

Bitcoin

Open interest has dropped from $14.6B to $10.7B. While there are still a large number of outstanding contracts, we may see further volatility before we reach the bottom.

Ethereum

Open interest has dropped from $5.9B to $4.7B. However, there is no significant sign of a decrease in the leverage ratio. Therefore, we may see more volatility before the leveraged positions get liquidated.

Potential Market Triggers

Bitcoin

• Nexo offers Celsius to buy their crypto asset. Users’ fund could be protected without crashing the market if Celsius accept the offer.

• Interest rate hikes. The Fed is likely to boost rates to 75 basis points, which would drive capital away from the crypto market and further towards safer-haven assets.

Ethereum

• The merge may postpone as developers delay the “difficulty bomb”*. The further selloff on $ETH and $stETH is due to uncertainty on the exact launch date of the merge.

3) Worst Case – Further Drawdowns

Market Market Sentiment Indicators

Bitcoin

• NUPL is trading 1% below the capitulation phase while 2020 bottomed at 14% below capitulation. Due to macro uncertainties, we may see NUPL drops lower than the 2020 level
• The market bottomed in 2020 by trading 15% below the realized price, while the current

Bitcoin price is trading 3% below.*

Ethereum

• NUPL is trading -23% in the capitulation phase while 2020 bottomed at -91% level.

• Ethereum is trading 32% below its realized price while the 2020 market bottomed at 48% deviation from the realized price.

Derivatives Data

Bitcoin

• DVOL* has jumped from 75 to 106 from 12 – 14 Jun. The metric shows a 5.5% daily volatility of bitcoin. The high volatility indicates that Bitcoin has not yet capitulated and could have a further downside.

Ethereum

• Futures long liquidations dominance has no sign of decreasing, which may herald that the long traders have not yet capitulated.

Potential Market Triggers

Bitcoin

• Contagion of Celsius’s insolvency will lead to huge selling pressure and liquidations of their wrapped Bitcoin position

• Celsius’s partners, such as Nuri Banking, will also be affected if it goes bankrupt. Customers’ Bitcoin deposits may not be recovered.

Tether has close ties with Celsius, including an investment in the company as well as lending on the platform.

• The depeg of $USDD* could lead to 14k Bitcoin selling pressure for saving the peg.

Ethereum

• Contagion of Celsius’s insolvency will also lead to selling pressure on $stETH. It will create a greater price deviation on stETH/ETH pair on Curve Finance. • A minor bug was found during the Ropsten testnet merge. The merge will be delayed to a later date. Exploits amongst DeFi protocols will also hurt Ethereum’s TVLand users’ confidence. 3 out of 5 largest DeFi hacks happened in 2022.

Metrics/Terms Description

• NUPL: Difference between Relative Unrealized Profit and Relative Unrealized Loss. NUPL below 0 indicates capitulation in the market

• Reserve Risk: Assess the confidence of long-term holders relative to the price via dividing the price of Bitcoin by the opportunity cost of holding the asset.

• Realized Price: Realized Cap divided by the current supply.

• DVOL: Measure the implied volatility in Bitcoin.

• TVL: Total Value Locked in DeFi.

• Difficulty Time Bomb: Increase the block difficulty, which will affect the merge if implemented before the merge is completed.

• USDD: An overcollateralized algorithmic stablecoin in the Tron ecosystem.

• stETH: Representation of underlying Ethereum that has been staked in Ethereum Beacon Chain – issued through LidoFinance

Weekly Returns

The returns of the top five cryptoassets over the last week were as follows — BTC (-28.8%), ETH (-33.22%), BNB (-23.10%), ADA(-21.31%), XRP (-21.19%).

Our View

Bitcoin and Ethereum are close to the bottom. Even though the price of Bitcoin and Ethereum have dropped 67% and 75% from all-time highs, they will be here to stay given the strong fundamentals and increasing use cases.

Referring to the NUPL chart for Bitcoin and Ethereum, we are close to the bottom by comparing the current NUPL level and the NUPL level during the bottom in 2020. We expect the NUPL level to bottom higher than in the previous cycles due to the higher lows formed from previous bottoming cycles.

Another metric that supports our view is the realized price of Bitcoin and Ethereum. Bitcoin is trading 3% below its realized price. By comparing to previous bottoms in 2019 and 2020, the market bottomed when Bitcoin was trading at 15% and 30% below its realized price. On the other hand, Ethereum is trading at 32% below its realized price. During market bottoms in 2018 and 2020, Ethereum traded at 48% and 67% below the realized price. Given an uptrend in the actual/realized price, we believe Bitcoin and Ethereum could dive lower but will not be at the same level of deviation from the realized price compared to previous cycles.

The potential event that can cause further drawdown of both markets is Celsius’s liquidity crisis. The firm has been using a liquid staking platform, Lido Finance, to provide returns for clients depositing their Ethereum. In return, Celsius received the liquid staking token, stETH, and used it as collateral to borrow stablecoins on several DeFi protocols to generate extra yield. However, the stETH token has recently deviated from the 1:1 peg with $ETH and caused a potential liquidation of Celsius’s position. Therefore, Celsius has been selling $320M crypto, including $WBTC and ETH, to repay the stablecoin loans. If $stETH continues to dive lower from the current exchange rate with $ETH, we may see a larger selloff in the crypto market as Celsius may potentially become insolvent. On the flipside, Nexo has offered to acquire Celsius’s assets so that Celsius will not have to liquidate their holdings and exacerbate the selling pressure.

Despite the turbulence in the market, the fundamentals of Bitcoin and Ethereum continue to see steady growth. Bitcoin’s number of active addresses has experienced 26% YTD growth, with 2 countries adopting the asset as legal tender. As for Ethereum serving as a smart contract platform, the network attracted 4,000 monthly active open-source developers as of Jan 2022. The increasing number of developers also resonates with the steady growth in the number of daily smart contracts. As of 14 June, more than 3,300 applications were built on top of Ethereum. DeFi sector has been one of the key innovations in the crypto space. Ethereum has more than $50B TVL, and institutions are also tapping their toes into DeFi as we saw how Jane Street has used Clearpool to borrow $25M $USDC, while Tesla has used MakerDao to borrow $7.8M for real estate financing.

Research Newsletter

Each week the 21Shares Research team will publish our data-driven insights into the crypto asset world through this newsletter. Please direct any comments, questions, and words of feedback to research@21shares.com

Disclaimer

The information provided does not constitute a prospectus or other offering material and does not contain or constitute an offer to sell or a solicitation of any offer to buy securities in any jurisdiction. Some of the information published herein may contain forward-looking statements. Readers are cautioned that any such forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve risks and uncertainties and that actual results may differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements as a result of various factors. The information contained herein may not be considered as economic, legal, tax or other advice and users are cautioned to base investment decisions or other decisions solely on the content hereof.

Fortsätt läsa
Annons
Klicka för att kommentera

Skriv en kommentar

Din e-postadress kommer inte publiceras. Obligatoriska fält är märkta *

Nyheter

SAVR inför maxcourtage på 99 kronor

Publicerad

den

Internetmäklaren SAVR kickar igång veckan med några fantastiska nyheter: SAVR introducerar ett tak för det courtage deras kunder betalar som ligger på låga 99 kronor, något som gäller samtliga marknader. Flera konkurrenter har maxcourtage sedan tidigare, men det är begränsat till Norden.

Internetmäklaren SAVR kickar igång veckan med några fantastiska nyheter: SAVR introducerar ett tak för det courtage deras kunder betalar som ligger på låga 99 kronor, något som gäller samtliga marknader. Flera konkurrenter har maxcourtage sedan tidigare, men det är begränsat till Norden.

Med andra ord ligger det courtage som kunder på SAVR betalar alltid mellan 1 och 99 kronor– oavsett vilken marknad du handlar på.

Huvudsakliga USP är

  • 99kr max för alla marknader (konkurrenterba har bara ”fast pris” för Norden)
  • Maxcourtage gäller samtliga aktiemarknader som SAVR erbjuder handel på – och så klart ETFer.
  • Justerar automatiskt om du gör mindre transaktioner (då blir det en %), så du löper ingen risk att betala 99kr för en 1000kr transaktion (”automatiskt courtage”). Det finns alltså inte courtageklasser att hålla reda på hos SAVR.

Fortsätt läsa

Nyheter

WINS ETF ger exponering mot industriföretag från hela världen

Publicerad

den

iShares MSCI World Industrials Sector ESG UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (WINS ETF) med ISIN IE00BJ5JP659, försöker följa MSCI World Industrials ESG Reduced Carbon Select 20 35 Capped-index. MSCI World Industrials ESG Reduced Carbon Select 20 35 Capped-index följer industrisektorn på de utvecklade marknaderna över hela världen (GICS-sektorklassificering). Aktierna som ingår filtreras enligt ESG-kriterier (miljö, social och bolagsstyrning). Uteslutna sektorer och företag: vapen, tobak, termiskt kol, oljesand, bristande efterlevnad av FN:s Global Compact. Vikten av den största beståndsdelen är begränsad till 35 % och vikten av alla andra beståndsdelar är begränsad till maximalt 20 %.

iShares MSCI World Industrials Sector ESG UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (WINS ETF) med ISIN IE00BJ5JP659, försöker följa MSCI World Industrials ESG Reduced Carbon Select 20 35 Capped-index. MSCI World Industrials ESG Reduced Carbon Select 20 35 Capped-index följer industrisektorn på de utvecklade marknaderna över hela världen (GICS-sektorklassificering). Aktierna som ingår filtreras enligt ESG-kriterier (miljö, social och bolagsstyrning). Uteslutna sektorer och företag: vapen, tobak, termiskt kol, oljesand, bristande efterlevnad av FN:s Global Compact. Vikten av den största beståndsdelen är begränsad till 35 % och vikten av alla andra beståndsdelar är begränsad till maximalt 20 %.

Den börshandlade fondens TER (total cost ratio) uppgår till 0,18 % p.a. iShares MSCI World Industrials Sector ESG UCITS ETF USD (Dist) är den enda ETF som följer MSCI World Industrials ESG Reduced Carbon Select 20 35 Capped-index. ETFen replikerar det underliggande indexets prestanda genom fullständig replikering (köper alla indexbeståndsdelar). Utdelningarna i ETFen delas ut till investerarna (halvårsvis).

iShares MSCI World Industrials Sector ESG UCITS ETF USD (Dist) är en liten ETF med tillgångar på 42 miljoner euro under förvaltning. Denna ETF lanserades den 7 april 2022 och har sin hemvist i Irland.

Varför WINS?

Exponering för stora och medelstora företag på utvecklade marknader involverade i tillverkning och distribution av kapitalvaror, tillhandahållande av kommersiella tjänster och leveranser och tillhandahållande av transporttjänster

Designad för investerare som vill ha exponering mot World Industrials Sector optimerad för att minska kolintensiteten och potentiella utsläpp, öka ESG-poängen och minimera tracking error i förhållande till moderindex.

Undersökt för att ta bort företag som är inblandade i kontroversiella, kärnvapen och konventionella vapen, civila skjutvapen, tobak, termiskt kol, oljesand och företag som klassificeras som brott mot FN:s Global Compact-principer, samt företag som har varit inblandade i allvarliga ESG-relaterade kontroverser

Investeringsmål

Fonden strävar efter att uppnå en total avkastning på din investering, genom en kombination av kapitaltillväxt och inkomst på fondens tillgångar, vilket återspeglar avkastningen från MSCI World Industrials ESG Reduced Carbon Select 20 35 Capped Index.

Handla WINS ETF

iShares MSCI World Industrials Sector ESG UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (WINS ETF) är en börshandlad fond (ETF) som handlas på Euronext Amsterdam.

Euronext Amsterdam är en marknad som få svenska banker och nätmäklare erbjuder access till, men DEGIRO gör det.

Börsnoteringar

BörsValutaKortnamn
Euronext AmsterdamUSDWINS
SIX Swiss ExchangeUSDWINS

Största innehav

KortnamnNamnSektorVikt (%)ISINValuta
SUSCHNEIDER ELECTRICIndustri4.18FR0000121972EUR
ABBNABB LTDIndustri3.59CH0012221716CHF
RELRELX PLCIndustri3.55GB00B2B0DG97GBP
ADPAUTOMATIC DATA PROCESSING INCIndustri3.55US0530151036USD
TTTRANE TECHNOLOGIES PLCIndustri2.97IE00BK9ZQ967USD
8001ITOCHU CORPIndustri2.97JP3143600009JPY
SIESIEMENS N AGIndustri2.11DE0007236101EUR
GEGE AEROSPACEIndustri2.08US3696043013USD
BRBROADRIDGE FINANCIAL SOLUTIONS INCIndustri1.95US11133T1034USD
CNRCANADIAN NATIONAL RAILWAYIndustri1.92CA1363751027CAD

Innehav kan komma att förändras

Fortsätt läsa

Nyheter

Europe’s defence awakening: strengthening security amid global shifts

Publicerad

den

The race to bolster European defence capabilities is well underway. Since the invasion of Ukraine, European leaders have intensified calls for increased defence spending. The continent, long reliant on US security guarantees, is now facing a critical inflection point. Recent moves by the US administration to engage with Russia without consulting its European allies or Ukraine have underscored the urgent need for Europe to take charge of its own defence. This geopolitical reality has forced European leaders to acknowledge that relying on US support is no longer a guaranteed strategy, accelerating discussions on independent military capabilities and funding mechanisms.

The race to bolster European defence capabilities is well underway. Since the invasion of Ukraine, European leaders have intensified calls for increased defence spending. The continent, long reliant on US security guarantees, is now facing a critical inflection point. Recent moves by the US administration to engage with Russia without consulting its European allies or Ukraine have underscored the urgent need for Europe to take charge of its own defence. This geopolitical reality has forced European leaders to acknowledge that relying on US support is no longer a guaranteed strategy, accelerating discussions on independent military capabilities and funding mechanisms.

Why is European defence spending rising?

For decades, the US has outspent Europe on defence, contributing more than two-thirds of NATO’s[1] overall budget. However, NATO estimates that in 2024, 23 out of 32 members met the 2% GDP[2] defence spending target, compared to just seven members in 2022 and three in 2014[3]. More ambitious goals are being discussed. Poland is leading the way with a 4.12% of GDP defence budget, while discussions at NATO suggest some countries may need to increase spending to 3% or higher1.

Figure 1: NATO allies defence spending following Russia’s invasion of Ukraine

Source: Atlantic Council, WisdomTree. 2024 numbers are estimates. Iceland excluded as it does not have a standing army. Historical performance is not an indication of future performance and any investments may go down in value.

Adding another layer of complexity is the US Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) initiative, which is beginning to reshape US defence priorities. The shift from cost-plus to fixed-price contracts under DOGE is putting financial pressure on defence companies most exposed to the US, which may see constraints on long-term spending commitments. This could have two contrasting effects: while it may limit US capability to fund European defence through NATO, it could also drive European nations to increase domestic procurement and reduce dependency on US defence systems.

Additionally, emerging security threats, including cyber warfare, artificial intelligence (AI)-driven military technology, and the growing presence of authoritarian regimes, have reinforced the need for increased defence investments. Europe’s reliance on outdated Cold War-era military equipment is another critical factor, pushing leaders to modernise their arsenals.

How will Europe fund its defence expansion?

Ramping up defence spending is a monumental task, especially given high sovereign debt levels across Europe. Yet, leaders are exploring creative solutions to secure the necessary funding. One approach is to reallocate existing European Union (EU) budgets, with discussions centring on repurposing unspent Cohesion Funds and Recovery and Resilience Facility (RRF) loans. However, legal restrictions within EU treaties may limit their direct application to military expenditures.

Another potential route is the issuance of European Defence Bonds, mirroring the successful NextGenerationEU pandemic recovery fund. By pooling resources at the EU level, this could offer a coordinated and cost-effective funding mechanism.

At the same time, private investment and public-private partnerships are gaining traction. Defence contractors and institutional investors are increasingly seen as strategic partners in financing large-scale projects, particularly in weapons systems, cyber defence, and artificial intelligence. Governments may leverage these collaborations to accelerate procurement and technological advancements.

Despite these options, one thing is clear—Europe must find a sustainable funding model to support its defence ambitions without derailing economic stability. Whether through EU-level financing, national budget reallocations, or private-sector involvement, securing long-term defence investment will be paramount in ensuring Europe’s security and strategic autonomy.

Impact on defence stocks: can the strong run continue?

European defence stocks have had a strong run since 2022, driven by surging order books, government contracts, and the realisation that military spending is no longer optional. Over the past year, Europe defence stocks rose 40.8%, outpacing broader European equities (+11.4%)[4]. Defence stocks trade at a historical P/E[5] ratio of ~14x, slightly above the long-term average, though still below peak multiples[6]

There are three key trends fuelling defence stock momentum:
• Backlogs at record highs: European defence contractors are sitting on unprecedented order books, with consensus forecasting 2024-29 CAGRs[7] of ~11% for sales and ~16% for both adjusted EBIT[8] and adjusted EPS[9]. These growth rates compare to just 8%, 11% and 12%, respectively, for the 2019-24 period[10].

Figure 2: European defence sector growth forecast

Source: Company Data, Visible Alpha Consensus, WisdomTree as of 31 January 2025. Forecasts are not an indicator of future performance and any investments are subject to risks and uncertainties.

• Government commitments: with long-term contracts locked in and additional spending likely, demand visibility remains strong.
• EU’s push for strategic autonomy: The European Commission has proposed a European Defence Industrial Strategy (EDIS), aimed at spending at least 50% of procurement budgets within the EU by 2030 and 60% by 2035[11].

Conclusion: a new era for European defence

The European defence sector is entering a new era of investment and strategic autonomy. With rising geopolitical risks and uncertainty over US support, European nations are taking proactive steps to build a more robust and self-sufficient military ecosystem. While funding challenges persist, the momentum behind higher budgets, technological investments, and NATO commitments makes this shift not just necessary, but inevitable.

With the EU backing structural shifts in procurement, defence stocks remain well-positioned, particularly those with exposure to land (for example, ammunition, vehicles) and air (for example, air defence, missiles, drones) domains.

Aneeka Gupta, Director, Macroeconomic Research, WisdomTree

This material is prepared by WisdomTree and its affiliates and is not intended to be relied upon as a forecast, research or investment advice, and is not a recommendation, offer or solicitation to buy or sell any securities or to adopt any investment strategy. The opinions expressed are as of the date of production and may change as subsequent conditions vary. The information and opinions contained in this material are derived from proprietary and non-proprietary sources. As such, no warranty of accuracy or reliability is given and no responsibility arising in any other way for errors and omissions (including responsibility to any person by reason of negligence) is accepted by WisdomTree, nor any affiliate, nor any of their officers, employees or agents. Reliance upon information in this material is at the sole discretion of the reader. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance.

[1] NATO = The North Atlantic Treaty Organization (an intergovernmental transnational military alliance of 32 member states).

[2] GDP = gross domestic product.

[3] NATO 2023 Vilnius Summit Declaration.

[4] Bloomberg, Europe defence stocks are represented by the MSCI Europe Aerospace & Defence Index and European Equities represented by MSCI Europe Index.

[5] P/E = price-to-earnings.

[6] Bloomberg as of 31 January 2025.

[7] CAGR = compound annual growth rate.

[8] EBIT = earnings before interest and taxes.

[9] EPS = earnings per share.

[10] Company data, Visible Alpha Consensus, WisdomTree as of 31 January 2025.

[11] European Commission: Joint communication to the European Parliament, the Council as of August 2024.


Fortsätt läsa

21Shares

Prenumerera på nyheter om ETFer

* indicates required

21Shares

Populära