Last week, the World Bank warned that oil prices could reach record highs of up to $150 a barrel on the back of the escalating war in the Middle East. Winter is coming, and an oil crisis even worse than that of 2022 would take a toll on consumer prices around the world. With U.S. inflation data scheduled for next week, short-term interest rate targets remain unchanged between 5.25% and 5.5%, with the possibility of raising them again as inflation is still well above the Fed’s 2% target. In this turbulent, unpredictable macroenvironment, more investors resorted to risk-on assets, such as equities and crypto. Nasdaq and S&P 500 are up by nearly 5% week-over-week. Bitcoin and Ethereum increased by 2.2% and 3.8% over the past week, respectively. The biggest winners of last week were Cardano (19.76%), Polygon (16.4%), and Aave (19.71%). In this report, we walk you through developments in the Ripple lawsuit, as well as developments in the Gemini Earn case. We also include highlights from Tether’s Q3 attestation report and how Cosmos is expanding its interoperability with Avalanche.
Figure 1: Weekly Price and TVL Developments of Cryptoassets in Major Sectors
Source: 21Shares, CoinGecko, DeFi Llama. Close data as of November 7, 2023.
5 Things to Remember in Markets this Week:
The Quest to Make Gemini Earn Investors Whole
On October 27, Gemini filed an adversary complaint against three Genesis entities and asked a New York bankruptcy court to grant it access to the over 62 million GBTC shares, which Genesis promised to deliver to secure loans made by Gemini users as part of its Gemini Earn program. Today, the collateral is worth nearly $1.7B, an amount that would completely satisfy the claims of every single Earn user. Genesis received another blow as the government did not support its updated bankruptcy plan to liquidate assets instead of reorganizing them. The bankruptcy court held a hearing to consider approval of the Disclosure Statement on November 7. As mentioned in our previous newsletter, the allegations in this lawsuit can further discourage users from leaving their assets on centralized exchanges or engaging with them at all. As shown in the figure below, Bitcoin and Ethereum’s balance on centralized exchanges has been in constant decline since the FTX fallout.
Figure 2: BTC and ETH Balance on Exchanges
Source: Glassnode
Bitcoin Transaction Fees Surge to June Highs
Bitcoin fees are once again surging, driven by the minting of Bitcoin’s NFTs, known as Ordinal inscriptions. The average transaction fee is now $5.93, up over 500% from August 2023 lows of ~$0.8 and the highest since June 23. Nearly 1.9 million ordinals were uploaded to Bitcoin in the past two weeks, signaling a revived on-chain demand, compared to less than 900K in the preceding 30 days. While ordinals have been limited to meme-coin implementations, they do act as a proxy for increasing demand for Bitcoin blockspace. Transaction fees now constitute ~8.5% of miners’ revenue, which is timely in the context of Bitcoin’s approaching halving, which will reduce the block rewards from 6.25 to 3.125 BTC, which some see as a deterrent for continuing to support Bitcoin’s mining activities. This is also relevant as it shows an appetite for engagement with the underlying network.
Figure 3: Total Number of Created Bitcoin NFTs
Source: 21.co on Dune Analytics
Ripple Continues its CBDC Mission
The National Bank of Georgia selected Ripple as its official technology partner to implement and deploy its central bank digital currency (CBDC), the digital lari. For context, Ripple launched its CBDC Platform last May, providing a holistic end-to-end solution that enables central banks, financial institutions, and governments to seamlessly mint, manage, transact, and redeem CBDCs. Ripple continues to secure strategic partnerships to enforce its value proposition as a crypto-native software solution for central banks around the world. So far, it has forged deals with Colombia, Palau, Bhutan, Montenegro, and Hong Kong to execute their CBDCs. Back in the U.S., Ripple is in its final steps to settle with the Securities and Exchanges Commission (SEC) before November 9. So far, there has been no announcement of settlement talks. According to Ripple’s legal team, if the settlement fee for the institutional sales of XRP is $20M or less, it would be a great advantage to Ripple, whose XRP token rallied 22.6% week-over-week. With this potential regulatory win, the Ripple case sets a new precedent for the industry, specifically in the case of “programmatic sales” of its XRP token on the secondary market. To learn more about the Ripple case, check out the special report that we published back in July.
Tether’s Cash Reserves Reach the Highest Percentage
Tether’s Q3 attestation report showed that cash and cash equivalents accounted for 85.7% of the leading stablecoin issuer’s total reserves. A ”vast majority” of those reserves are U.S. T-Bills, which comprised $72.6B in both direct and indirect exposure. The report also highlighted that secured loans extended by Tether have been reduced by over $330M, although it had previously stated that it would stop issuing secured loans in 2023. Moreover, the German data center, Northern Data, secured $610M in unsecured debt from Tether for financing its Bitcoin mining, AI, and data center operations. This is a crucial data point that we’ll be closely monitoring to better understand the level of risk Tether is taking on. Nevertheless, flows into Tether’s USDT have increased by 2% month-over-month, reaching its market cap to a new record high of $85.5B.
Cosmos Expanding Interoperability to Avalanche
Cosmos interoperability technology has been successfully exported to the Avalanche network on the testnet. The integration involved building a light Inter Blockchain communication (IBC) protocol client on Avalanche to allow seamless connectivity between both networks, along with the other 50+ IBC-enabled chains. This is a significant milestone as it marks the first integration outside the Cosmos ecosystem.
Not only does this development bring us closer to a trustless multi-chain future that doesn’t depend on vulnerable cross-chain bridges, but it also unlocks new opportunities for both ATOM and AVAX, making them more appealing to markets with higher demand, such as BNB, third largest blockchain by AUM. Finally, it’s worth noting that Avalanche isn’t the final destination, especially due to its underwhelming $550M AUM, but rather a starting point for expanding IBC to networks like Solana and Ethereum with much deeper liquidity and a vibrant user base. The timing is also crucial for Cosmos to maintain its relevance, especially in light of Chainlink’s aggressive efforts to expand its interoperability protocol, CCIP.
Figure 4: Daily Active Addresses On Cosmos, Ethereum, Solana, and Avalanche
Source: Artemis
What You Should Pay Attention To
Arbitrum Staking Proposal and the Implications for the Scalability Landscape
The Arbitrum DAO is currently contemplating enabling ARB token staking, proposing to fund it with 175M, 150M, 125M, or 100M ARB tokens over the course of 12 months from the treasury. It is worth noting that Arbitrum depends on Ethereum for security, so staking here is misleading as it simply is a yield-generating activity, in contrast to contributing to the network’s security, much like Ethereum staking. Crucially, this approach suggests using existing treasury funds rather than sharing revenue to avoid legal scrutiny and steering clear of making ARB a security, all while keeping the door open for future value accrual models like sharing sequencer revenue.
Although concerns about securitization persist, this initiative is promising for Arbitrum as it could set it apart within the scalability sector. More importantly, it could catalyze change for other scaling projects with limited token utility beyond governance, drawing inspiration from past attempts like Uniswap’s free-switch proposal, which would have turned UNI into a yield-bearing asset but failed. That said, the effectiveness of this approach remains to be seen, as it could inadvertently amplify the token’s inflation for ARB down the line by offering a staggering 130% APR if the current vote of 100M tokens is enacted instead of supporting the network’s participants and helping grow its ecosystem. Nonetheless, it’s an intriguing development that highlights the challenge of making tokens useful in the L2 vertical.
Enhancing Solana’s Accessibility and User-Friendliness: Key Upgrades Discussed at the Breakpoint Conference
Solana’s annual conference revealed compelling developments expected to fuel the network’s recent momentum. Firstly, the network’s long-anticipated Fire Dancer client was finally deployed on the testnet. For reference, a validator client is a software that acts on behalf of a validator to verify transactions and participate in consensus. Previously, Solana relied solely on a single software, leading to network outages when it encountered issues. Thus, the introduction of this new client will be crucial in solving the single point of failure on the validator software layer.
On a different note, Solana Labs announced that nodes can now be deployed on Amazon Web Services as part of their Blockchain Node Engine Program. AWS-based nodes can engage in both consensus and RPC calls, simplifying the intricacies of running a validator and making it accessible to a broader audience. It’s important to highlight, however, that depending on centralized cloud providers like AWS could pose a vulnerability, as demonstrated by Hetzner’s anti-crypto policies last year, which threatened Ethereum nodes’ presence on the platform. Hence, while this integration opens up access to a broader user base, it’s crucial for the industry to actively work on abstracting the validation process to reduce dependence on centralized service providers.
Lastly, Solana introduced its first smart wallet. This user-friendly wallet offers social recovery and eliminates the need for seed phrases, addressing key adoption hurdles for non-crypto-native users. All in all, It’s exciting to witness these substantial advancements reigniting enthusiasm within the Solana community, as indicated by the resurgence in transaction values, which had previously stagnated following the FTX collapse.
Figure 5: Total Value Transacted On-chain on Solana
Source: The Block
Bookmarks
• Find out more about price movements in October in our latest Crypto of the Month.
• Check out our webinar, where the Research Team introduced the latest issue of the State of Crypto, featuring a special guest.
• Get a digital copy of State of Crypto issue 10!
Next Week’s Calendar
These are the top 3 events we’re monitoring for next week.
• November 8 and 9: Fed Chair Jerome Powell will speak on two different occasions.
• November 9: SEC and Ripple’s deadline to settle.
• November 14: Monthly and yearly inflation data in the U.S.
Each week the 21Shares Research team will publish our data-driven insights into the crypto asset world through this newsletter. Please direct any comments, questions, and words of feedback to research@21shares.com
Disclaimer
The information provided does not constitute a prospectus or other offering material and does not contain or constitute an offer to sell or a solicitation of any offer to buy securities in any jurisdiction. Some of the information published herein may contain forward-looking statements. Readers are cautioned that any such forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve risks and uncertainties and that actual results may differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements as a result of various factors. The information contained herein may not be considered as economic, legal, tax or other advice and users are cautioned to base investment decisions or other decisions solely on the content hereof.
Aktier med låg volatilitet tenderar att ge en överavkastning jämfört med den risk som tas. Denna forskningsbaserade observation kallas lågvolatilitetsfaktorn vilket gynnat uppkomsten av lågvolatilitets ETFer.
Det finns olika möjliga förklaringar till detta: Till exempel kan aktier med låg volatilitet uppfattas som mindre givande av investerare då de är förknippade med mindre risk. En annan teori tyder på att investerare generellt överskattar sin förmåga att prognostisera. För särskilt volatila aktier finns en större oenighet mellan investerare, vilket bör leda till högre volatilitet och lägre avkastning.
Denna faktorstrategi kan även implementeras med hjälp av ett index. I den här investeringsguiden hittar du alla tillgängliga globala ETF:er med låg volatilitet. För närvarande finns det fem index som spåras av åtta olika ETFer tillgängliga. Den årliga förvaltningskostnaden för dessa börshandlade fonder ligger på mellan 0,25 och 0,30 procent.
En jämförelse av olika lågvolatilitets ETFer
Förutom avkastning finns det ytterligare viktiga faktorer att tänka på när du väljer lågvolatilitets-ETFer. För att ge ett bra beslutsunderlag hittar du en lista över olika lågvolatilitets -ETFer med information om kortnamn, kostnad, utdelningspolicy, fondens hemvist och replikeringsmetod.
För ytterligare information om respektive börshandlad fond, klicka på kortnamnet i tabellen nedan.
Amundi MSCI World IMI Value Screened Factor UCITSETFUCITSETFAcc (WMMS ETF) med ISIN IE000AZV0AS3, försöker spåra MSCI World IMI Value Select ESG Low Carbon Target-index. MSCI World IMI Value Select ESG Low Carbon Target-index spårar aktier från utvecklade länder över hela världen som väljs ut enligt värdefaktorstrategin och ESG-kriterier (miljö, social och företagsstyrning). Indexet har som mål att minska utsläppen av växthusgaser och ett förbättrat ESG-poäng jämfört med jämförelseindex. Jämförelseindexet är MSCI World IMI.
Den börshandlade fondens TER (total cost ratio) uppgår till 0,25 % p.a. Amundi MSCI World IMI Value Screened Factor UCITSETFUCITSETFAcc är den enda ETF som följer MSCI World IMI Value Select ESG Low Carbon Target-index. ETFen replikerar det underliggande indexets prestanda genom fullständig replikering (köper alla indexbeståndsdelar). Utdelningarna i ETF:n ackumuleras och återinvesteras.
Denna ETF lanserades den 30 oktober 2024 och har sin hemvist i Irland.
Investeringsmål
Amundi MSCI World IMI Value Screened Factor UCITSETFAcc försöker replikera, så nära som möjligt, oavsett om trenden är stigande eller fallande, resultatet för MSCI World IMI Value Select ESG Low Carbon Target Index (”Indexet”). Delfondens mål är att uppnå en tracking error-nivå för delfonden och dess index som normalt inte överstiger 1 %
Det betyder att det går att handla andelar i denna ETF genom de flesta svenska banker och Internetmäklare, till exempel DEGIRO, Nordnet, Aktieinvest och Avanza.
The iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLT) holds US government bonds that mature in 20 years or more. Since peaking in March 2020 at $179.90 per share, TLT’s price is still down roughly 50%. Most of that drop happened as US inflation – and then interest rates – rose to multi-decade highs. But with inflation now below 3%, potential interest rate cuts ahead, and an interesting chart setup, the investment case for TLT could be building.
What is TLT?
The iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLT) is an exchange-traded fund (ETF) that trades on the US stock market. The fund holds “long-dated” US government bonds with maturities of 20 years or more. By holding a basket of them, TLT reflects how investors generally value this part of the bond market.
Each bond in TLT is a 20-plus year loan to the US government. The investor lends money, and in return receives fixed interest payments (coupons) each year. The government sets the coupon rate when it issues (creates) a new bond, and that rate never changes. After issuance, the bond can trade on the bond market, where its price may move up or down.
What affects the value of long-dated US Treasury bonds (and TLT)?
All else being equal, long-dated Treasury bonds tend to be more volatile than shorter-dated ones. Interest rates and inflation expectations are the two main levers that can move their prices – and hence the price of TLT.
Interest rates: When rates rise, newly issued bonds pay higher coupons. Older bonds in TLT can then look relatively less attractive, so their prices may fall. When rates fall, it’s the opposite: new bonds pay lower coupons, so older bonds look “better” and may rise in price. Because TLT only holds long-dated bonds, its price tends to react more to interest rate changes than short-term bond funds. Rate shifts tend to have a bigger impact on long-dated bonds because their fixed coupons extend far into the future. Even a small change in yields can make those older coupons look much better – or much worse – for a very long time.
Inflation expectations: When investors expect higher inflation in the future, the fixed coupons (and principal) in TLT can look less valuable in today’s money. That perception can push bond prices down as investors sell bonds. And when investors think futureinflation will be lower, the same coupons can look more valuable today, which may support bond prices. Because TLT’s bonds mature further into the future, inflation has more time to erode their interest and principal repayments. That’s why long-dated bonds are usually more sensitive to inflation than shorter-dated ones.
The chart below compares the price of TLT (orange) with US interest rates (black) and US inflation (blue). It’s not an exact science, but TLT has tended to move opposite to both of them since the ETF launched in 2003.
Other factors can also play a role. The US government regularly issues (creates) new bonds, and if supply goes up, prices can fall. On the demand side, big buyers like pension funds, insurance companies, or foreign central banks can move the market. Credit risk perception is also key. Investors usually see Treasuries as very low risk, but not “risk-free”. So if they lose confidence in the US government’s repayment ability, it could hurt bond prices.
The investment case for TLT today
We’ve explained how lower interest rates and lower inflation might be a better environment for long-dated US treasury bonds. As explained below, there are reasons to believe we could be moving into that environment now.
The US Federal Reserve (Fed) essentially has two jobs, and it’s a constant balancing act between the two:
Keep inflation down (by raising interest rates to slow the economy).
Keep employment high (by lowering interest rates to speed up the economy).
US inflation peaked above 9% in June 2022, and it’s been trending lower ever since. Inflation isn’t very low yet (2.9% CPI as of August) – but it’s low enough for the Fed to focus more on job number two. Factor in a slowing economy, and the Fed is more likely to cut interest rates from here to boost employment numbers.
The chart below shows the US unemployment rate in orange. It’s now at 4.3% (August) – the highest unemployment rate since November 2021. In the past, unemployment rose gradually at first, before eventually breaking much higher. If that pattern repeats, we could see a bigger spike in unemployment.
Not only is the unemployment rate rising, but the number of new job openings is dropping, too. US nonfarm payrolls (new jobs excluding farming, private households, non-profits, and the military) showed that the US economy added just 22,000 new jobs in August.
And to make matters worse, the government also revised its earlier estimates down. The adjustment meant the US added around 911,000 fewer jobs in the year through March 2025 than first reported.
AI could also factor into these numbers. After all, companies are rolling out AI tech to improve productivity – and that puts pressure on the “human” job market. AI can also make goods and services cheaper to produce, which is inherently disinflationary (the opposite of inflation).
This setup could give the Fed more ammo for bigger rate cuts in the future. Throw in lower inflation, and we could see a solid backdrop for TLT.
The technical picture for TLT
Not many assets are trading near 20-year lows. But as the chart below shows, TLT is trading near technical “support” from the early 2000s (orange). Also note that TLT recently broke above a downward sloping trendline that’s been in play since December 2021. This may signal that selling pressure is easing, and buyers are stepping in.
The chart below shows Bollinger Bands around TLT’s price. Here, the middle band is TLT’s 20-month average price, and each red or green candle represents one month of price movement for TLT.
The further the outer bands are from the middle band, the more volatile TLT’s price, according to the indicator. At this point, the Bollinger Bands are pinching together – a sign of relatively low volatility for TLT. Volatility tends to be “mean reverting” – meaning it usually cycles from periods of lower volatility to higher volatility. If the bands now start to widen, and the price trends higher, we could see a sustained rally for TLT.
The next chart zooms into the weekly timeframe, where each red or green candle represents one week of price movement for TLT. In this case, the Bollinger band width represents the volatility of TLT around its 20-week moving average. The blue line underneath it shows the width of the Bollinger Bands – lower is narrower, and less volatility.
Last month, the Bollinger Bands reached their narrowest level since September 2018. In other words, TLT’s volatility reached its lowest level in seven years, according to the indicator. Now notice how the bands started expanding this month – from that very low volatility base. This suggests TLT could see more volatility going into the end of 2025. Keep in mind that volatility is direction neutral.
Risks
The investment case for TLT depends heavily on inflation staying low and the Fed being willing to cut rates. If inflation rises again, TLT may fall further. Heavy government borrowing could also pressure Treasuries if investors demand more compensation to buy the debt. And if the economy holds up better than expected, the Fed might not need to cut rates.