Markets reacted in opposite directions this month, as regulating the cryptoasset industry is still in talks in the U.S. New developments in the Ripple case spurred some optimism, with the hope that the long tail of cryptoassets may not be considered crypto-securities. Bitcoin and Ethereum fell by almost 4% each over the past month. However, the market cap of the decentralized finance (DeFi) industry alone has increased by 8%. As shown below, the biggest winners of July were Maker, which increased by 50% in returns, Solana (+28%) came in second, and thirdly Optimism (+ 21.8%). These jumps in price movements can be attributed to fundamental improvements and developments in both the application and infrastructure layers, which we will elaborate on later in this monthly review.
Figure 1: Price and TVL Development of Major Crypto Sectors
Source: 21shares, CoinGecko, DeFi Llama. Data as of July 30 close.
5 Trends to Remember from July
• XRP by itself may not be a security, according to a U.S. court decision.
On July 13, U.S. District Court Judge Analisa Torres issued a summary judgment order that was partly in favor of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and partly in favor of Ripple. Specifically, Judge Torres distinguished between the target of an investment contract (e.g., XRP as a token) versus the sale and marketing of that asset (e.g., the investment contract around the sale or offer of XRP). The former was not held to be a security, but the latter was in certain circumstances. Judge Torres’ decision also held that there were disputes of material fact that were not appropriate to resolve on summary judgment, so there could be a trial relating to a few additional issues (including whether Ripple’s founders aided and abetted Ripple’s securities law violations). Although not conclusive, the court’s decision spurred short-lived optimism across the cryptoassets market. On July 13, Bitcoin reached $31.45K, the highest since May 2022. Ethereum, on the other hand, surpassed the $2K, a level last seen in April following the Shanghai upgrade. As for the industry’s long tail of tokens, especially those labeled in previous SEC lawsuits (against Coinbase and Binance) as securities, Solana, Polygon, and Cardano all enjoyed roughly 30% increase in returns for the two days following the verdict.
Hoping it would mean the same for the collapsed Terra Luna, Terraform Labs filed a motion to dismiss their case based on Judge Torres’ “programmatic sales” argument. On July 21, the lawyers for the SEC filed a response against Terraform’s motion, vaguely suggesting that they’re considering an appeal against the Ripple court decision. Judge Jed Rakoff rejected Terraform’s motion at the end of the month, saying that the court rejected the approach adopted by Judge Torres in the Ripple case. While this may not change XRP’s ruling, it may affect the market sentiment of the token, which has persevered as of writing this report, still enjoying the 40% increase over the past month.
• MakerDAO: A Return to Fundamentals
Maker also implemented the enhanced DAI savings rate (eDSR), first increasing the yield to 3.49% in June, while a subsequently approved proposal in late July switched the interest rate into a dynamic model that could potentially see the yield reach 8%. Thus, eDSR could catalyze the adoption of DAI as the deposit rewards could surpass the risk-free benchmark of traditional finance, represented by the US treasury at 4%, and help to establish an attractive savings rate that could improve the liquidity of DeFi. This isn’t to argue that Maker’s deposit rewards would be considered a safe investment compared to the risk-free rate of the US Treasury, as the US government is the sole lender of last resort, but it does show the measures DeFi protocols are adopting in order to compete and build a sustainable treasury leveraging the current macro environment. Although temporary, elevated interest rates present a valuable window for projects to capitalize on, fostering lasting treasury growth. Finally, Maker’s shift towards real-world assets (RWA) is proving fruitful, generating around $90M in annual revenue, with more than 50% exposure.
Figure 2: Revenues per Type
Source: Steakhouse on Dune
This growth is significant as it provides a practical revenue generation approach without relying solely on token emissions. It also showcases the benefits of bridging with the TradFi, encouraging other protocols to build sustainable treasuries for runway protection during times of volatility. Furthermore, the increase in DAI’s savings rate elevates DeFi’s stablecoin yield benchmark, incentivizing protocols to become more competitive and driving further user adoption. It is worth noting that DeFi tokens outperformed the market in July, potentially forming a bottom for the first time in almost two years. So, we’ll be closely observing Maker’s impact on the broader sector and how it could influence their decision to further integrate with TradFi.
Figure 3: Price Indices Performance of the Different Ethereum Industries
Source: Glassnode
• The Evolution of Polygon 2.0 as an Infrastructure Power House
The Polygon Foundation has revealed plans for the infrastructure of Polygon 2.0. This new network aims to unify various scaling services under a Layer 2 framework that uses Zero Knowledge technology for interoperability. The architecture has four main categories: Staking, Interoperability, Execution, and Proving, with emphasis on the first two. The staking layer will offer shared security like Polkadot and Cosmos, while interoperability focuses on native asset transfers across networks. Polygon will also upgrade its POS chain to a zkEVM network, using existing validators for submitting routing data to Ethereum.
Further, The MATIC token will transition to POL at a 1:1 ratio with uncapped supply and 2% yearly emissions to support staking and the ecosystem’s growth. Finally, Governance will be categorized into three branches to establish clear responsibilities for the stakeholders and form a treasury to help drive the growth of Polygon. The announcement, culminating Polygon’s 6-week program to unveil its new network design, saw a steady growth in total number of users and an increase of close to 100% in AuM on the new scaling solution, climbing from ~$23M to ~$55M, as shown below.
Figure 4: Polygon zkEVM scaling solution AuM
Source: 21shares on Dune
• A Rise in Institutional Adoption
With Europe’s first comprehensive legislation regulating cryptoassets (Markets in Crypto Assets) going into effect in 2024, the following instances speak volumes of the dire need for legal clarity to streamline the adoption of this asset class along with its underlying technology, especially for institutions.
• Societe Generale became the first company to receive a digital asset service provider (DASP) license in France. The license allows Forge, the bank’s cryptoasset division, to operate digital asset custody, sell and purchase digital assets for legal tender, and trade digital assets. In April, Forge launched CoinVertible (EURCV), an institutional-grade, euro-pegged stablecoin so far only built on the Ethereum blockchain, with plans to become blockchain-agnostic.
• Bank of Italy partnered with Polygon for a limited environment for trading securities on DeFi, tailored especially for institutions. Milano Hub, the bank’s innovation center, selected the “Institutional DeFi for Security Token Ecosystem Project”, an ecosystem project promoted by Cetif Advisory to research opportunities offered by DeFi and experiment with security tokens. This project is anticipated to act as a catalyst to onboard Italian banks, asset management companies, and other financial institutions into a DeFi platform that is fully compliant with regulatory requirements, which is the main obstacle to institutional adoption.
Figure 5: Breakdown of the RWA-backed assets issued by Institutions on the Polygon network
Source: Polygon Analytics on Dune
• Ethereum’s Scaling Solutions are Transitioning Towards Customizable Scalability
Allowing projects to deploy tailored applications as standalone networks enables customization of fee payments, permissions, and application development using various programming languages. Initiating this trend in early 2023, Arbitrum and Optimism introduced Orbit and OpStack, respectively, to bootstrap the creation of custom networks. OpStack emerged as the preferred solution, as it was adopted by major players like Coinbase, Binance, WorldCoin, and Zora, leveraging Optimism’s law of chains to promote seamless interoperability among OP-stack-based chains and addressing a crucial gap in crypto’s infrastructure. For context, Coinbase’s base network launched on July 13, securing close to $85M in total deposits in less than two weeks. Although the hype around meme coins drove the activity, the trend still demonstrates users’ excitement for Ethereum’s scaling future.
Figure 6: Gas Used by Scaling Solutions to Settle Transactions on Ethereum
Source: @msiib7 on Dune
That said, ZkSync and Starkware entered the competition with ZKStack and Stark Net Stacks in July, offering customizable frameworks for embryonic networks to address their unique business needs. This development brings exciting prospects for programmable scalability and resolves privacy issues that are not easily achievable on Ethereum or its scaling solutions alone. Finally, the trend of embracing the Ethereum ecosystem was evident with Celo’s announced intent to pivot from an Ethereum competitor into an L2 anchored to Ethereum’s security. A decision that is driven by the need to benefit from the deep liquidity and vibrant developer ecosystem
What to Expect
• A Breakthrough in Resolving Cryptocurrency Infrastructure Challenges
Chainlink’s highly anticipated interoperability product finally launched on Mainnet. CCIP is an inter-blockchain communication standard that enables data and value transfer across four incompatible networks at the start. The solution incorporates four features to improve bridging: Active Risk Management (ARM) Network to detect and pause the malicious activity, programmatic transfers to automatically execute predefined instructions, rate limits for preventing unauthorized token transfers beyond a certain threshold, and smart execution to enable seamless cross-chain activities without extra payments using a pre-funded account. Check out our State of Crypto Issue 8 for a deeper dive into the technology.
CCIP is crucial in addressing weak security in cross-chain bridges, which have been exploited for nearly $2.5B in value over time. Thus, it’s a pivotal milestone to have an internet of contracts, similar to how the TCP/IP unified the global internet, facilitating liquidity to be globally accessible and the value of applications to flow across networks to be established on a battle-tested infrastructure that has enabled more than $8T in transactional value.
Further, CCIP may become Chainlink’s most significant product due to the wide need for interoperability. For context, applications using Chainlink’s CCIP can pay in LINK or ERC20 tokens, with a 10% premium on ERC20 to encourage LINK usage. This makes LINK a universal gas currency across chains, removing the need for token sales by node operators and phasing out the foundation’s subsidies. Finally, with a fee-based model in place, CCIP can generate sustainable earnings for DONs, the backbone of Chainlink’s security. That said, despite initial modest earnings of $35K over the past months, partnerships with Synthetic and Aave using CCIP for token transfers and cross-chain governance suggest significant growth potential. Integration with SWIFT also solidifies CCIP’s position as a cross-chain solution for both crypto and traditional finance.
Figure 7: Total Revenue Accrued by CCIP
Source: @Ericwallach on Dune
• Solana Attempting to Claw Back
Although Solana faced a challenging start to the year due to FTX’s collapse, then the SEC’s legal actions against Coinbase and Binance, recent developments have hinted at a potential recovery. First, Solana Labs introduced Solang, enabling Ethereum developers to use Solidity (Ethereum’s programming language) on Solana, and GameShift, a web3 game development API streamlining the game development process. Then, Neon EVM went live, offering Ethereum-compatible smart contracts on Solana without significant code modifications.
Overall, Solana’s activity is showing signs of hopeful recovery, with active addresses rising 25% in the past seven weeks and total AuM hitting a year-high. Catalysts like Jump Crypto’s Firedancer, diversifying node software and combating outages, and demanding apps like Hiver and Teleport could drive excitement. Further, Saga, Solana’s phone device, might boost adoption as it abstracts the complexity of web3. Nonetheless, there’s still a lot of work to do to encourage users to move their capital back to Solana, especially as the total value transferred on the network remains at relatively muted levels.
Figure 8: Monthly Value moved on Solana
Source: TheBlock
• Ramifications of the Ripple Case
Although the court decision is inconclusive, we may see foundations and developers rethinking their strategies when bootstrapping their services and products to accommodate regulatory expectations, primarily concerning how their protocols achieve decentralization. It took Uniswap two years to launch its token after it had dedicated this time to focus on the fundamentals of the decentralized app, which is a tactic that has proved to pay off, building Uniswap to become the world’s largest decentralized exchange with more than $3B in assets under management and a market cap of almost $5B. More projects at the application layer could postpone token launches until they establish alignment between their product’s core services and market demand. Established projects may overhaul their entire business models to enhance token value capture. As discussed earlier in this report, we are already witnessing this shift with Polygon’s new tokenomics. Following Uniswap’s steps, entrepreneurs will focus their efforts on scoring investments from traditional players in venture capital and private equity instead of launching their tokens from the very start to raise funds.
Bookmarks
Research Analyst Tom Wan’s insights were featured on Forkast News.
Digging Into Ethereum Withdrawals and Future Improvements.
Want to learn more about Ripple? Read our investment thesis.
Celsius has been selling its assets as part of its bankruptcy proceedings.
Learn more about Ethereum’s Liquid Staking Derivatives, which now constitute the largest DeFi sector by AUM and are expected to continue proliferating as the ETH staking ratio grows.
Next Month’s Calendar
These are the top events we’re closely monitoring in August.
Each week the 21Shares Research team will publish our data-driven insights into the crypto asset world through this newsletter. Please direct any comments, questions, and words of feedback to research@21shares.com
Disclaimer
The information provided does not constitute a prospectus or other offering material and does not contain or constitute an offer to sell or a solicitation of any offer to buy securities in any jurisdiction. Some of the information published herein may contain forward-looking statements. Readers are cautioned that any such forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve risks and uncertainties and that actual results may differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements as a result of various factors. The information contained herein may not be considered as economic, legal, tax or other advice and users are cautioned to base investment decisions or other decisions solely on the content hereof.
Franklin Templeton är glada att kunna tillkännage lanseringen av sin nya Franklin US Mega Cap 100 UCITSETF. Den nya ETFen är utformad för att ge investerare riktad exponering mot de 100 största amerikanska mega-cap-aktierna, vilka är de ledande företagen från världens största aktiemarknad. Detta erbjudande är ytterligare ett tillägg till Franklin Templeton ETF-sortimentet och bringar det totala antalet indexerade ETFer till 28 och dedikerade ETFer med exponering mot amerikanska aktier till fem.
ETFen noterades på Deutsche Börse Xetra (XETRA) den 8 maj 2025, London Stock Exchange (LSE), Euronext Paris och Borsa Italiana den 9 maj 2025. Dessutom är den registrerad i Österrike, Danmark, Finland, Frankrike, Tyskland, Irland (hemvistland), Italien, Luxemburg, Nederländerna, Spanien, Sverige och Storbritannien.
Den nya ETFen kommer att följa Solactive US Mega Cap 100 Select Index, som i sin tur följer utvecklingen för de 100 största företagen inom Solactive GBS United States 500 Index. Urvalet baseras på totalt börsvärde. Företag involverade i kontroversiella vapen exkluderas. Genom att vikta komponenter enligt deras fritt flytande börsvärde syftar indexet till att säkerställa bred marknadsrepresentation samtidigt som diversifieringen bibehålls.
Caroline Baron, chef för ETF-distribution, EMEA, Franklin Templeton, kommenterade: ”Om man ser tillbaka 30 år har de 100 största värdepapperen i amerikanska aktier uppnått större marknadsuppsida än ett bredare index som S&P 500. Denna ETF kan användas av investerare som ett smidigt verktyg för att öka exponeringen mot den amerikanska aktiemarknaden eller snabbt genomföra en riskbaserad handel, vilket erbjuder en tydlig risk-avkastningsprofil.”
Viktiga funktioner hos Franklin US Mega Cap 100 UCITS ETF
Förbättrad avkastningspotential: Den nya ETFen kommer att fokusera på de 100 största amerikanska mega-cap-aktierna, som historiskt sett har överpresterat bredare index.
Riktad exponering: Den kommer att ge ett strategiskt verktyg för investerare att övervikta de största tillväxtnamnen på den amerikanska marknaden.
Kostnadseffektiv: Den nya ETF:en erbjuder en kostnadseffektiv lösning för att få tillgång till de största amerikanska mega-cap-aktierna med en total kostnadskvot (TER) på 0,09 %4
De nya ETFerna kommer att förvaltas av Dina Ting, chef för Global Index Portfolio Management, och Lorenzo Crosato, ETF-portföljförvaltare, som har mer än tre decenniers kombinerad erfarenhet inom kapitalförvaltningsbranschen och dokumenterad meritlista inom hantering av ETF-strategier. Matt Harrison, chef för Amerika (ex USA), Europa och Storbritannien, tillade: ”Franklin Templeton är dedikerade till att bygga ut sitt ETF-utbud för att ge investerare en mängd olika verktyg för att uppnå sina investeringsmål. Lanseringen av Franklin US Mega Cap 100 UCITSETF exemplifierar detta engagemang. Denna nya ETF erbjuder inte bara attraktiv avkastningspotential utan fungerar också som ett strategiskt verktyg för investerare att övervikta de största tillväxtföretagen på den amerikanska marknaden.”
Rafaelle Lennox, chef för UCITSETF-produktstrategi, Franklin Templeton, påpekade: ”Den amerikanska aktiemarknaden är fortfarande ett kraftpaket inom globala investeringar, driven av kontinuerlig innovation och stark vinsttillväxt. Genom att fokusera på de 100 ledande företagen sett till börsvärde kommer denna exponering att anpassas och utvecklas för att representera den underliggande amerikanska aktiemarknaden allt eftersom den förändras över tid.”
Franklin Templetons globala ETF-plattform gör det möjligt för investerare att uppnå sina önskade investeringsresultat genom en rad indexerade och aktiva ETFer. Med stöd av styrkan och resurserna hos en av världens största kapitalförvaltare har den globala ETF-plattformen cirka 38 miljarder dollar i förvaltat kapital globalt per den 30 april 2025.
De flesta av oss har någon gång suckat över att de traditionella fonder som vi ville köpa blev så pass mycket dyrare än förväntat. De flesta som valt att investera i fonder är förvisso långsiktiga, och har inte för avsikt att daytrada med traditionella fonder. Oavsett detta kan det bli betydligt dyrare än tänkt om det tar lång tid att köpa traditionella fonder.
Ärligt talat så har nog inte ens finansproffs fullständig koll på vad de får för kurs när de köper fondandelar. Undantaget torde vara de som arbetar med just fondhandel, något som är en hel vetenskap. Visste du till exempel att traditionella fonder inte har köp- eller säljkurser som du har på en vanlig aktie?
Istället är det något som heter NAV-kursen som styr priset som du får betala för din fond. Det är det sammanlagda värdet på allt vad fonden äger, minus avgifterna, vilket sedan delas med antalet andelar. Kalla det för fondens substansvärde i brist på bättre, men det är en bra beskrivning. Nu blir det emellertid komplicerat eftersom olika fondbolag räknar fram sitt NAV-värde vid olika tillfällen.
Nästa ord som vi måste lära oss är brytttid, vilket utgör den sista tidpunkten på dagen som det går att lägga en order. Bryttiden skall framgå av fondens informationsblad. Är bryttiden 10,00 är det en större chans att det pris du får betala överensstämmer med NAV-värdet än om bryttiden är klockan 16,00. Så är det i alla fall i teorin. Vad händer om du väljer att köpa en fond som investerar i amerikanska aktier? Vad händer när du köper en fond som investerar i Sydkorea? Ja Du förstår själv, att handla med traditionella fonder är en hel vetenskap.
Handelsdagen är den delen av dagen som är före bryttiden. Lägger du en säljorder efter bryttiden räknas nästföljande dag som handelsdag, givet att det är en dag då det sker handel.
Skulle du vilja sälja en fond för att köpa en annan fond kan du behöva räkna med att det tar några dagar. Det kan dröja flera dagar innan försäljningen är bokförd och du har pengarna på ditt konto. Särskilt lång tid tar det om det är ett utländskt fondbolag.
Förvaltningsavgiften dras dagligen
När vi skrev om NAV-värdet skrev vi att det var värdet på alla fondens innehav, minus avgifterna. Alla fonder tar varje dag ut 1/365-del av sin förvaltningsavgift. Om vi antar att denna är på en procent, blir det en daglig kostnad på 2,74 kronor för ett innehav om 100 000 kronor.
Det finns emellertid att alternativ, ETFer, eller börshandlade fonder. Med hjälp av dessa är du bara begränsad till börsens öppettider. Du köper dina andelar på börsen, genom din vanliga mäklare eller bank, till exempel DEGIRO, Nordnet, Aktieinvest och Avanza. I vissa fall tillkommer en växlingsavgift. Detta då utbudet av börshandlade fonder på den svenska börsen är ganska lågt. I Tyskland finns Xetra, Europas största marknadsplats för ETFer. I och med att denna börs finns i Tyskland sker handeln i euro.
BNP Paribas Easy ECPI Global ESG Med Tech UCITSETF USD (BJLA ETF) med ISIN LU2533811084, försöker följa ECPI Global ESG Medical Tech-index. ECPI Global ESG Medical Tech-index spårar företag från utvecklade marknader över hela världen som är aktiva inom medicinteknikbranschen. Aktierna som ingår filtreras enligt ESG-kriterier (miljö, social och bolagsstyrning). De utvalda värdepapperen viktas lika i indexet.
Den börshandlade fondens TER (total cost ratio) uppgår till 0,30 % p.a. BNP Paribas Easy ECPI Global ESG Med Tech UCITSETF USD är den billigaste ETF som följer ECPI Global ESG Medical Tech-index. ETFen replikerar det underliggande indexets prestanda genom full replikering (köper alla indexbeståndsdelar). Utdelningarna i ETFen ackumuleras och återinvesteras.
BNP Paribas Easy ECPI Global ESG Med Tech UCITSETF USD är en mycket liten ETF med tillgångar på 1 miljon euro under förvaltning. Denna ETF lanserades den 18 januari 2023 och har sin hemvist i Luxemburg.
Det betyder att det går att handla andelar i denna ETF genom de flesta svenska banker och Internetmäklare, till exempel DEGIRO, Nordnet, Aktieinvest och Avanza.